Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20099953›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2010

Mediators of a brief hypnosis intervention to control side effects in breast surgery patients: response expectancies and emotional distress.

Guy H Montgomery, Michael N Hallquist, Julie B Schnur, Daniel David, Jeffrey H Silverstein, Dana H Bovbjerg

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The impact of hypnotic suggestibility in clinical care settings.The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis · 2011
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Hypnotherapy to Reduce Hot Flashes: Examination of Response Expectancies as a Mediator of Outcomes.Journal of evidence-based complementary & alternative medicine · 2017
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The Role of Hypnosis in Cancer Care.Current oncology reports · 2018
    Review
  20. Interest and Attitudes about Hypnosis in a Large Community Sample.Psychology of consciousness (Washington, D.C.) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guy H MontgomeryDepartment of Oncological Sciences, Box 1130, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA. guy.montgomery@mssm.edu
Michael N Hallquist
Julie B Schnur
Daniel David
Jeffrey H Silverstein
Dana H Bovbjerg
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USBinghamton University · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

A Presurgery Hypnosis Training Program for Nurse AnesthetistsR25CA129094 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI MONTGOMERY, GUY H · 2007 to 2011
$1.5M
Skin Toxicity Effects in Breast Radiation: A Cognitive Behavioral InterventionK07CA131473 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SCHNUR, JULIE B. · 2008 to 2012
$637k
NCI NIH HHS CA131473NCI NIH HHS K07 CA131473NCI NIH HHS R25 CA129094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present study was designed to test the hypotheses that response expectancies and emotional distress mediate the effects of an empirically validated presurgical hypnosis intervention on postsurgical side effects (i.e., pain, nausea, and fatigue).

methodWomen (n = 200) undergoing breast-conserving surgery (mean age = 48.50 years; 63% White, 15% Hispanic, 13% African American, and 9% other) were randomized to a hypnosis or to an attention control group. Prior to surgery, patients completed assessments of hypothesized mediators (response expectancies and emotional distress), and following surgery, patients completed assessments of outcome variables (pain, nausea, and fatigue).

resultsStructural equation modeling revealed the following: (a) Hypnotic effects on postsurgical pain were partially mediated by pain expectancy (p < .0001) but not by distress (p = .12); (b) hypnotic effects on postsurgical nausea were partially mediated by presurgical distress (p = .02) but not by nausea expectancy (p = .10); and (c) hypnotic effects on postsurgical fatigue were partially mediated by both fatigue expectancy (p = .0001) and presurgical distress (p = .02).

conclusionsThe results demonstrate the mediational roles of response expectancies and emotional distress in clinical benefits associated with a hypnotic intervention for breast cancer surgical patients. More broadly, the results improve understanding of the underlying mechanisms responsible for hypnotic phenomena and suggest that future hypnotic interventions target patient expectancies and distress to improve postsurgical recovery.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionBreastChi-Square DistributionFatigueFemaleHumansHypnosisMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative Nausea and VomitingPostoperative PainStress, PsychologicalSuggestionSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID20099953
PMCPMC2819459
OpenAlexW2114089452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.