Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20099949›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2010

Effects of an intensive depression-focused intervention for smoking cessation in pregnancy.

Paul M Cinciripini, Janice A Blalock, Jennifer A Minnix, Jason D Robinson, Victoria L Brown, Cho Lam, David W Wetter, Lisa Schreindorfer, James P McCullough, Patricia Dolan-Mullen and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Smoking cessation interventions for smokers with current or past depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Contingency Management Versus Psychotherapy for Prenatal Smoking Cessation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Paul M CinciripiniDepartment of Behavioral Science.
Janice A BlalockDepartment of Behavioral Science.
Jennifer A MinnixDepartment of Behavioral Science.
Jason D RobinsonDepartment of Behavioral Science.
Victoria L BrownDepartment of Behavioral Science.
Cho LamDepartment of Behavioral Science.
David W WetterDepartment of Behavioral Science.ORCID 0000-0002-6366-0108
Lisa SchreindorferDepartment of Behavioral Science.
James P McCulloughDepartment of Psychology.
Patricia Dolan-MullenDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences.
Angela L StottsDepartment of Family and Community Medicine.
Maher Karam-HageDepartment of Behavioral Science.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

A Mood Management Intervention for Pregnant SmokersR01DA014301 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CINCIRIPINI, PAUL MICHAEL · 2003 to 2007
$2.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA014301NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA14301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate a depression-focused treatment for smoking cessation in pregnant women versus a time and contact health education control. We hypothesized that the depression-focused treatment would lead to improved abstinence and reduced depressive symptoms among women with high levels of depressive symptomatology. No significant main effects of treatment were hypothesized.

methodPregnant smokers (N = 257) were randomly assigned to a 10-week, intensive, depression-focused intervention (cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy; CBASP) or to a time and contact control focused on health and wellness (HW); both included equivalent amounts of behavioral and motivational smoking cessation counseling. Of the sample, 54% were African American, and 37% met criteria for major depression. Mean age was 25 years (SD = 5.9), and women averaged 19.5 weeks (SD = 8.5) gestation at study entry. We measured symptoms of depression using the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (Radloff, 1977).

resultsAt 6 months posttreatment, women with higher levels of baseline depressive symptoms treated with CBASP were abstinent significantly more often, F(1, 253) = 5.61, p = .02, and had less depression, F(1, 2620) = 10.49, p = .001, than those treated with HW; those with low baseline depression fared better in HW. Differences in abstinence were not retained at 6 months postpartum.

conclusionsThe results suggest that pregnant women with high levels of depressive symptoms may benefit from a depression-focused treatment in terms of improved abstinence and depressive symptoms, both of which could have a combined positive effect on maternal and child health.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceChi-Square DistributionCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionDepressive DisorderFemaleHealth EducationHumansOdds RatioPregnancyPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSeverity of Illness IndexSmoking CessationSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeTobacco Use Disorder

Identifiers

PMID20099949
PMCPMC2881321
OpenAlexW2037109973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.