ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2010
A single amino acid change in Ca(v)1.2 channels eliminates the permeation and gating differences between Ca(2+) and Ba(2+).
Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lead poisoning: acute exposure of the heart to lead ions promotes changes in cardiac function and Cav1.2 ion channels.Biophysical reviews · 2017Review
- CaV1.2/CaV3.x channels mediate divergent vasomotor responses in human cerebral arteries.The Journal of general physiology · 2015Article
- T-type calcium channels and vascular function: the new kid on the block?The Journal of physiology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glutamate scanning mutagenesis was used to assess the role of the calcicludine binding segment in regulating channel permeation and gating using both Ca(2+) and Ba(2+) as charge carriers. As expected, wild-type Ca(V)1.2 channels had a Ba(2+) conductance ~2x that in Ca(2+) (G(Ba)/G(Ca) = 2) and activation was ~10 mV more positive in Ca(2+) vs. Ba(2+). Of the 11 mutants tested, F1126E was the only one that showed unique permeation and gating properties compared to the wild type. F1126E equalized the Ca(V)1.2 channel conductance (G(Ba)/G(Ca) = 1) and activation voltage dependence between Ca(2+) and Ba(2+). Ba(2+) permeation was reduced because the interactions among multiple Ba(2+) ions and the pore were specifically altered for F1126E, which resulted in Ca(2+)-like ionic conductance and unitary current. However, the high-affinity block of monovalent cation flux was not altered for either Ca(2+) or Ba(2+). The half-activation voltage of F1126E in Ba(2+) was depolarized to match that in Ca(2+), which was unchanged from that in the wild type. As a result, the voltages for half-activation and half-inactivation of F1126E in Ba(2+) and Ca(2+) were similar to those of wild-type in Ca(2+). This effect was specific to F1126E since F1126A did not affect the half-activation voltage in either Ca(2+) or Ba(2+). These results indicate that residues in the outer vestibule of the Ca(V)1.2 channel pore are major determinants of channel gating, selectivity, and permeation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.