Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20098699›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Association of Group B Streptococcus colonization and bovine exposure: a prospective cross-sectional cohort study.

Shannon D Manning, A Cody Springman, Amber D Million, Nicole R Milton, Sara E McNamara, Patricia A Somsel, Paul Bartlett, H Dele Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative Genomic Analysis of Bovine and Publicly Available HumanAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Zoonotic Approach toInternational journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Virulence Factor Genes and Cytotoxicity ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2022
    Article
  7. Prevalence and Characteristics ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Unusual finding of the human-adapted hypervirulent serotype III/ST17 clone in a historical bovine Group B Streptococcus isolate from Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Article
  9. IL-17A Secreted by Th17 Cells Is Essential for the Host againstJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Population structure and virulence gene profiles of Streptococcus agalactiae collected from different hosts worldwide.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shannon D ManningMicrobial Evolution Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
A Cody Springman
Amber D Million
Nicole R Milton
Sara E McNamara
Patricia A Somsel
Paul Bartlett
H Dele Davies

Funding

Genetic Diversity and Molecular Epidemiology of GBSR01AI066081 · NIAID · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIES, HERBERT D · 2005 to 2008
$1.1M
NIAID NIH HHS AI066081NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030058NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-30058NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI066081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile Group B Streptococcus (GBS) human colonization and infection has long been suspected as originating from cows, several investigators have suggested that ongoing interspecies GBS transmission is unlikely due to genotyping data demonstrating that human and bovine-derived GBS strains represent mostly distinct populations. The possibility of ongoing transmission between humans and their livestock has not been systematically examined. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsTo examine ongoing interspecies transmission, we conducted a prospective cross-sectional cohort study of 68 families and their livestock. Stool specimens were collected from 154 people and 115 livestock; GBS was detected in 19 (12.3%) humans and 2 (1.7%) animals (bovine and sheep). Application of multilocus sequence typing (MLST) identified 8 sequence types (STs or clones), with STs 1 and 23 predominating. There were 11 families in which two members submitted stools and at least one had GBS colonization. In 3 of these families, both members (consisting of couples) were colonized, yielding a co-colonization rate of 27% (95% CI: 7%-61%). Two of these couples had strains with identical MLST, capsule (cps) genotype, susceptibility, and RAPD profiles. One couple co-colonized with ST-1 (cps5) strains also had a bovine colonized with the identical strain type. On multivariate analysis of questionnaire data, cattle exposure was a predictor of GBS colonization, with each unit increase in days of cattle exposure increasing the odds of colonization by 20% (P = 0.02). These results support interspecies transmission with additional evidence for transmission provided by the epidemiological association with cattle exposure. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Although GBS uncommonly colonizes livestock stools, increased frequency of cattle exposure was significantly associated with human colonization and one couple shared the same GBS strains as their bovine suggesting intraspecies transmission. These results set the framework for GBS as a possible zoonotic infection, which has significant public health implications.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnimalsCattleCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFecesFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisPhylogenyRandom Amplified Polymorphic DNA TechniqueStreptococcus agalactiaeZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID20098699
PMCPMC2808344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.