ArticlePloS one2010
Association of Group B Streptococcus colonization and bovine exposure: a prospective cross-sectional cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative genomic and phenotypic analysis of human- and dairy cattle -derived Streptococcus agalactiae reveals potential cross-species infection capability.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparative Genomic Analysis of Bovine and Publicly Available HumanAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Zoonotic Approach toInternational journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- Interspecies Interactions within the Host: the Social Network of Group BInfection and immunity · 2023Review
- Integrating filter paper extraction, isothermal amplification, and lateral flow dipstick methods to detectFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Virulence Factor Genes and Cytotoxicity ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Prevalence and Characteristics ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Unusual finding of the human-adapted hypervirulent serotype III/ST17 clone in a historical bovine Group B Streptococcus isolate from Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021Article
- IL-17A Secreted by Th17 Cells Is Essential for the Host againstJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Article
- A Narrative Review of the Molecular Epidemiology and Laboratory Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Bacterial Meningitis Agents:Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Investigation of extramammary sources of Group B Streptococcus reveals its unusual ecology and epidemiology in camels.PloS one · 2021Article
- Article
- Population Gene Introgression and High Genome Plasticity for the Zoonotic Pathogen Streptococcus agalactiae.Molecular biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Potential group B Streptococcus interspecies transmission between cattle and people in Colombian dairy farms.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Whole-Genome Shotgun Sequence of Streptococcus agalactiae Sequence Type 176 Strain 3966RFQB from a Dairy Herd in Selangor, Malaysia.Microbiology resource announcements · 2019Article
- Genomic Insights Into the Distribution and Evolution of Group B Streptococcus.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
- Isolation of Streptococcus agalactiae in a female llama (Lama glama) in South Tyrol (Italy).BMC veterinary research · 2018Article
- RitR is an archetype for a novel family of redox sensors in the streptococci that has evolved from two-component response regulators and is required for pneumococcal colonization.PLoS pathogens · 2018Article
- Population structure and virulence gene profiles of Streptococcus agalactiae collected from different hosts worldwide.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018Article
- Group B Streptococcal Maternal Colonization and Neonatal Disease: Molecular Mechanisms and Preventative Approaches.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile Group B Streptococcus (GBS) human colonization and infection has long been suspected as originating from cows, several investigators have suggested that ongoing interspecies GBS transmission is unlikely due to genotyping data demonstrating that human and bovine-derived GBS strains represent mostly distinct populations. The possibility of ongoing transmission between humans and their livestock has not been systematically examined. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsTo examine ongoing interspecies transmission, we conducted a prospective cross-sectional cohort study of 68 families and their livestock. Stool specimens were collected from 154 people and 115 livestock; GBS was detected in 19 (12.3%) humans and 2 (1.7%) animals (bovine and sheep). Application of multilocus sequence typing (MLST) identified 8 sequence types (STs or clones), with STs 1 and 23 predominating. There were 11 families in which two members submitted stools and at least one had GBS colonization. In 3 of these families, both members (consisting of couples) were colonized, yielding a co-colonization rate of 27% (95% CI: 7%-61%). Two of these couples had strains with identical MLST, capsule (cps) genotype, susceptibility, and RAPD profiles. One couple co-colonized with ST-1 (cps5) strains also had a bovine colonized with the identical strain type. On multivariate analysis of questionnaire data, cattle exposure was a predictor of GBS colonization, with each unit increase in days of cattle exposure increasing the odds of colonization by 20% (P = 0.02). These results support interspecies transmission with additional evidence for transmission provided by the epidemiological association with cattle exposure. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Although GBS uncommonly colonizes livestock stools, increased frequency of cattle exposure was significantly associated with human colonization and one couple shared the same GBS strains as their bovine suggesting intraspecies transmission. These results set the framework for GBS as a possible zoonotic infection, which has significant public health implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.