ArticleCurrent pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine2009
Paving the Way to Personalized Genomic Medicine: Steps to Successful Implementation.
Article in Current pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drop-to-drop liquid-liquid extraction of DNA in an electrowetting-on-dielectric digital microfluidics.Biomicrofluidics · 2021Article
- Implementing genomics and pharmacogenomics in the clinic: The National Human Genome Research Institute's genomic medicine portfolio.Atherosclerosis · 2016Review
- Building towards precision medicine: empowering medical professionals for the next revolution.BMC medical genomics · 2016Article
- National Institutes of Health Center for Regenerative Medicine: putting science into practice.Stem cells and development · 2013Article
- Expanding the foundation for personalized medicine: implications and challenges for dentistry.Journal of dental research · 2013Review
- "It's not like judgment day": public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information.Journal of genetic counseling · 2012Article
- Public health in the genomic era: will Public Health Genomics contribute to major changes in the prevention of common diseases?Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2011Article
- Personalised medicine in Canada: a survey of adoption and practice in oncology, cardiology and family medicine.BMJ open · 2011Article
- Morphological and functional MDCT: problem-solving tool and surrogate biomarker for hepatic disease clinical care and drug discovery in the era of personalized medicine.Hepatic medicine : evidence and research · 2010Review
- Development of a Potential Bone-Seeking Radiopharmaceutical by Sodium Pyrophosphate LabeledIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPRArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the last decade there has been vast interest in and focus on the implementation of personalized genomic medicine. Although there is general agreement that personalized genomic medicine involves utilizing genome technology to assess individual risk and ensure the delivery of the "right treatment, for the right patient, at the right time," different categories of stakeholders focus on different aspects of personalized genomic medicine and operationalize it in diverse ways. In order to move toward a clearer, more holistic understanding of the concept, this article begins by identifying and defining three major elements of personalized genomic medicine commonly discussed by stakeholders: molecular medicine, pharmacogenomics, and health information technology. The integration of these three elements has the potential to improve health and reduce health care costs, but it also raises many challenges. This article endeavors to address these challenges by identifying five strategic areas that will require significant investment for the successful integration of personalized genomics into clinical care: (1) health technology assessment; (2) health outcomes research; (3) education (of both health professionals and the public); (4) communication among stakeholders; and (5) the development of best practices and guidelines. While different countries and global regions display marked heterogeneity in funding of health care in the form of public, private, or blended payor systems, previous analyses of personalized genomic medicine and attendant technological innovations have been performed without due attention to this complexity. Hence, this article focuses on personalized genomic medicine in the United States as a model case study wherein a significant portion of health care payors represent private, nongovernment resources. Lessons learned from the present analysis of personalized genomic medicine could usefully inform health care systems in other global regions where payment for personalized genomic medicine will be enabled through private or hybrid public-private funding systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.