ArticleAir quality, atmosphere, & health2009
Some considerations for the communication of results of air pollution health effects tracking.
Article in Air quality, atmosphere, & health, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Communicating the Risks of Air Pollution to the Public: A Perspective from Jordan and Lebanon.Environmental health insights · 2022Article
- Perceptions and Attitudes of Gynecologic and Pediatric Professionals Regarding Dietary Exposure to Chemical Pollutants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Introducing a new measure for assessing self-efficacy in response to air pollution hazards for pregnant women.Journal of environmental health science & engineering · 2013Article
- The influence of uncertain map features on risk beliefs and perceived ambiguity for maps of modeled cancer risk from air pollution.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2013Article
- A decade of environmental public health tracking (2002-2012): progress and challenges.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPReview
- Monitoring intraurban spatial patterns of multiple combustion air pollutants in New York City: design and implementation.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Communicating effectively and efficiently on air quality and its health impacts is an important but difficult and complex task. It requires careful consideration of the audience one wants to reach, the messages one is trying to present, the venue through which the message will be delivered. The audience, context, technique, and content factors may affect how well it is heard and how appropriately it is interpreted. In this short paper, I describe many of these concerns and provide some suggestions for how best to address them. However, since every audience differs in goals, characteristics, and nature, what is most important is implementing an effective communications program. This program should include frequent two-way communication, repeated and on-going evaluation of how well the audience understands the messages, and consideration of how to improve the delivery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.