Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20097562›Full record

ArticleBioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters2010

The Privileged Chemical Space Predictor (PCSP): a computer program that identifies privileged chemical space from screens of modularly assembled chemical libraries.

Steven J Seedhouse, Lucas P Labuda, Matthew D Disney

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven J SeedhouseDepartment of Chemistry and The Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, 657 Natural Sciences Complex, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Lucas P Labuda
Matthew D Disney
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Identifying and Studying RNA Loop-Small Molecule InteractionsR01GM079235 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI DISNEY, MATTHEW D · 2008 to 2012
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079235NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM079235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modularly assembled combinatorial libraries are often used to identify ligands that bind to and modulate the function of a protein or a nucleic acid. Much of the data from screening these compounds, however, is not efficiently utilized to define structure-activity relationships (SAR). If SAR data are accurately constructed, it can enable the design of more potent binders. Herein, we describe a computer program called Privileged Chemical Space Predictor (PCSP) that statistically determines SAR from high-throughput screening (HTS) data and then identifies features in small molecules that predispose them for binding a target. Features are scored for statistical significance and can be utilized to design improved second generation compounds or more target-focused libraries. The program's utility is demonstrated through analysis of a modularly assembled peptoid library that previously was screened for binding to and inhibiting a group I intron RNA from the fungal pathogen Candida albicans.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDrug DesignPeptide LibrarySoftwareCandida albicansCombinatorial Chemistry TechniquesDNAInhibitory Concentration 50LigandsMolecular StructureProtein BindingSmall Molecule LibrariesStructure-Activity RelationshipDNALigandsPeptide LibrarySmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID20097562
PMCPMC2825671
OpenAlexW1963645976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.