Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20097268›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta2010

Contributions of estrogen receptor-α and estrogen receptor-ß to the regulation of behavior.

Marc J Tetel, Donald W Pfaff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Late pregnancy is vulnerable period for exposure to BPA.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Steroids, stress and the gut microbiome-brain axis.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marc J TetelNeuroscience Program, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA, USA.
Donald W Pfaff
Rockefeller University · USWellesley College · US

Funding

Brain Mechanisms of Reproductive BehaviorR37HD005751 · NICHD · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI PFAFF, DONALD W. · 2003 to 2012
$3.8M
RETICULOSPINAL &VESTIBULOSPINAL CONTROL OF BACK MUSCLESR01MH038273 · NIMH · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI PFAFF, DONALD W. · 1985 to 2010
$3.6M
Mechanisms of Steroid Hormone Action in BrainR01DK061935 · NIDDK · WELLESLEY COLLEGE · PI TETEL, MARC JEFFREY · 2002 to 2014
$2.7M
BRAIN MECHANISMS OF REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR IN RATSR01HD005751 · NICHD · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI PFAFF, DONALD WELLS · 1985 to 2002
$999k
NICHD NIH HHS HD-05751NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD005751NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD005751NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK061935NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK61935NIMH NIH HHS MH-38273NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH038273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of the mechanisms by which estrogens influence brain function and behavior have advanced from the explication of individual hormone receptors, neural circuitry and individual gene expression. Now, we can report patterns of estrogen receptor subtype contributions to patterns of behavior. Moreover, new work demonstrates important contributions of nuclear receptor coactivator expression in the central nervous system. In this paper, our current state of knowledge is reviewed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehaviorBehavior, AnimalEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor betaFemaleGene Expression RegulationHumansMaleESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor beta

Identifiers

PMID20097268
PMCPMC4472314
OpenAlexW2137788215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.