Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20097117›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2010

Imaging mobile zinc in biology.

Elisa Tomat, Stephen J Lippard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Fast Ion-Chelate Dissociation Rate forJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Crosstalk between zinc and free fatty acids in plasma.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular and cell biology of lipids · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Techniques for measuring cellular zinc.Archives of biochemistry and biophysics · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Caging metal ions with visible light-responsive nanopolymersomes.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elisa TomatDepartment of Chemistry 18-498, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Stephen J Lippard

Funding

Investigation of Zinc Neurochemistry by Optical Sensing and MRIR01GM065519 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI NOLAN, ELIZABETH M · 2002 to 2017
$5.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM065519NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trafficking and regulation of mobile zinc pools influence cellular functions and pathological conditions in multiple organs, including brain, pancreas, and prostate. The quest for a dynamic description of zinc distribution and mobilization in live cells fuels the development of increasingly sophisticated probes. Detection systems that respond to zinc binding with changes of their fluorescence emission properties have provided sensitive tools for mobile zinc imaging, and fluorescence microscopy experiments have afforded depictions of zinc distribution within live cells and tissues. Both small-molecule and protein-based fluorescent probes can address complex imaging challenges, such as analyte quantification, site-specific sensor localization, and real-time detection.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiosensing TechniquesFluorescent DyesHumansMicroscopy, FluorescenceSpectrometry, FluorescenceZincFluorescent DyesZinc

Identifiers

PMID20097117
PMCPMC2847655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.