Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20096136›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2010

The effectiveness and cost-evaluation of manual therapy and physical therapy in patients with sub-acute and chronic non specific neck pain. Rationale and design of a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Ruud Groeneweg, Hans Kropman, Huco Leopold, Luite van Assen, Jan Mulder, Maurits W van Tulder, Rob A B Oostendorp

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00713843 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Manual Therapy and Physical Therapy in Patients With Subacute and Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2008 to 2014Enrolled180ConditionsNeck PainArmsManual Therapy Utrecht, Physical Therapy
NCT01418170 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Dose Response Effects of Cervical SMT on Pressure Sensitivity of Myofascial Trigger Points

TypeinterventionalSponsorCanadian Memorial Chiropractic CollegeRan2011 to 2012Enrolled26ConditionsTrigger Points, Myofascial, Myofascial Trigger Points, Myofascial Pain SyndromeArmscervical spinal manipulative therapy
NCT04557904 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Craniocervical Flexion Exercises and Scapular Stabilization Exercises in Neck Pain and Forward Head Posture Among Female Wearing Head Scarves

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled50ConditionsCervical PainArmsCraniocervical flexion exercises, Scapular stabilization exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Cost-effectiveness of manual therapy versus physiotherapy in patients with sub-acute and chronic neck pain: a randomised controlled trial.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2016
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ruud GroenewegRadboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Scientific Institute for Quality of Health Care, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. r.groeneweg@iq.umcn.nl
Hans Kropman
Huco Leopold
Luite van Assen
Jan Mulder
Maurits W van Tulder
Rob A B Oostendorp

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManual Therapy applied to patients with non specific neck pain has been investigated several times. In the Netherlands, manual therapy as applied according to the Utrecht School of Manual Therapy (MTU) has not been the subject of a randomized controlled trial. MTU differs in diagnoses and treatment from other forms of manual therapy. METHODS/

designThis is a single blind randomized controlled trial in patients with sub-acute and chronic non specific neck pain. Patients with neck complaints existing for two weeks (minimum) till one year (maximum) will participate in the trial. 180 participants will be recruited in thirteen primary health care centres in the Netherlands.The experimental group will be treated with MTU during a six week period. The control group will be treated with physical therapy (standard care, mainly active exercise therapy), also for a period of six weeks.Primary outcomes are Global Perceived Effect (GPE) and functional status (Neck Disability Index (NDI-DV)). Secondary outcomes are neck pain (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)), Eurocol, costs and quality of life (SF36). DISCUSSION: This paper presents details on the rationale of MTU, design, methods and operational aspects of the trial.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00713843.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisDisability EvaluationExercise TherapyFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal ManipulationsNeck PainNetherlandsOutcome Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID20096136
PMCPMC2822827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.