Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20096101›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2010

Assembly of 500,000 inter-specific catfish expressed sequence tags and large scale gene-associated marker development for whole genome association studies.

Shaolin Wang, Eric Peatman, Jason Abernathy, Geoff Waldbieser, Erika Lindquist, Paul Richardson, Susan Lucas, Mei Wang, Ping Li, Jyothi Thimmapuram and 32 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

42 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Shaolin WangThe Fish Molecular Genetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Fisheries and Allied Aquacultures and Program of Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Aquatic Genomics Unit, 203 Swingle Hall, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA. wangsha@auburn.edu
Eric Peatman
Jason Abernathy
Geoff Waldbieser
Erika Lindquist
Paul Richardson
Susan Lucas
Mei Wang
Ping Li
Jyothi Thimmapuram
Lei Liu
Deepika Vullaganti
Huseyin Kucuktas
Christopher Murdock
Brian C Small
Melanie Wilson
Hong Liu
Yanliang Jiang
Yoona Lee
Fei Chen
Jianguo Lu
Wenqi Wang
Peng Xu
Benjaporn Somridhivej
Puttharat Baoprasertkul
Jonas Quilang
Zhenxia Sha
Baolong Bao
Yaping Wang
Qun Wang
Tomokazu Takano
Samiran Nandi
Shikai Liu
Lilian Wong
Ludmilla Kaltenboeck
Sylvie Quiniou
Eva Bengten
Norman Miller
John Trant
Daniel Rokhsar
Zhanjiang Liu
Catfish Genome Consortium
Auburn University · USJoint Genome Institute · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USState Street (United States) · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThrough the Community Sequencing Program, a catfish EST sequencing project was carried out through a collaboration between the catfish research community and the Department of Energy's Joint Genome Institute. Prior to this project, only a limited EST resource from catfish was available for the purpose of SNP identification.

resultsA total of 438,321 quality ESTs were generated from 8 channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) and 4 blue catfish (Ictalurus furcatus) libraries, bringing the number of catfish ESTs to nearly 500,000. Assembly of all catfish ESTs resulted in 45,306 contigs and 66,272 singletons. Over 35% of the unique sequences had significant similarities to known genes, allowing the identification of 14,776 unique genes in catfish. Over 300,000 putative SNPs have been identified, of which approximately 48,000 are high-quality SNPs identified from contigs with at least four sequences and the minor allele presence of at least two sequences in the contig. The EST resource should be valuable for identification of microsatellites, genome annotation, large-scale expression analysis, and comparative genome analysis.

conclusionsThis project generated a large EST resource for catfish that captured the majority of the catfish transcriptome. The parallel analysis of ESTs from two closely related Ictalurid catfishes should also provide powerful means for the evaluation of ancient and recent gene duplications, and for the development of high-density microarrays in catfish. The inter- and intra-specific SNPs identified from all catfish EST dataset assembly will greatly benefit the catfish introgression breeding program and whole genome association studies.

Indexed as

Expressed Sequence TagsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAllelesAnimalsCatfishesContig MappingDatabases, GeneticDNA, ComplementaryGene Expression ProfilingGenetic MarkersGenomeGenome-Wide Association StudyMicrosatellite RepeatsModels, GeneticOpen Reading FramesDNA, ComplementaryGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID20096101
PMCPMC2847720
OpenAlexW2158295184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.