Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20095092›Full record

ArticleActa oto-laryngologica2010

Adenovector-mediated hair cell regeneration is affected by promoter type.

Mark Praetorius, Chi Hsu, Kim Baker, Douglas E Brough, Peter Plinkert, Hinrich Staecker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oto-laryngologica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Organotypic Culture of Neonatal Murine Inner Ear Explants.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Cochlear gene therapy.Current opinion in neurology · 2012
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Regeneration of Hair Cells: Making Sense of All the Noise.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2011
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark PraetoriusDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Chi Hsu
Kim Baker
Douglas E Brough
Peter Plinkert
Hinrich Staecker
GenVec · USHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

Research Design and Analysis Core (RDAC)P30HD002528 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI FOWLER, STEPHEN CLETIUS · 1985 to 2015
$22.1M
Development of atonal therapy for bilateral vestibular hypofunctionR01DC008424 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI STAECKER, HINRICH · 2007 to 2011
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS HD02528NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD002528NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008424NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC008424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

conclusionReplacement of vestibular hair cells induced by atoh1 driven by the tissue-specific GFAP promoter was significantly more efficient than use of the cBA or hCMV promoter.

objectiveTo test whether expression level, persistence, or selectivity from adenovirus vectors delivered in the inner ear can be altered by changing the adenovector backbone or by using different cellular and viral promoters. MATERIALS AND

methodsAdenovector and promoter modifications were tested for differences in transgene expression in adult macular organs. The effect of using an E1/E3 deleted vector was compared to E1/E3/E4 deleted vectors. The effect of using viral and cellular promoters to modify transgene expression was tested in explanted adult mouse macular organs. Based on these results three different promoters were tested for efficacy of atonal gene.

resultsUse of adenovectors containing human CMV, the hybrid cBA and ubiquitin promoters driving transgene expression resulted in different types of transgene expression. While several viral and cellular promoters provided broad cell type expression, expression driven by the GFAP promoter was limited to vestibular supporting cells, demonstrating the specificity of this promoter.

Indexed as

Acoustic MaculaeAdenovirus E1A ProteinsAnimalsCytomegalovirusDisease Models, AnimalEar, InnerGene Expression Regulation, ViralGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHair Cells, VestibularMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred CBAAdenovirus E1A ProteinsGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsUbiquitins

Identifiers

PMID20095092
PMCPMC5267485
OpenAlexW2095394899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.