Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20094045›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2010

Mitotic chromosomal instability and cancer: mouse modelling of the human disease.

Juan-Manuel Schvartzman, Rocio Sotillo, Robert Benezra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 271 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
271citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

271 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Role of TRIP13 in human cancer development.Molecular biology reports · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The two sides of chromosomal instability: drivers and brakes in cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

211 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juan-Manuel SchvartzmanProgram in Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Rocio Sotillo
Robert Benezra

Funding

Role of Mitotic Checkpoint Defects in Mouse Tumor ModelsR01CA124378 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI BENEZRA, ROBERT I · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA124378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stepwise progression from an early dysplastic lesion to full-blown metastatic malignancy is associated with increases in genomic instability. Mitotic chromosomal instability - the inability to faithfully segregate equal chromosome complements to two daughter cells during mitosis - is a widespread phenomenon in solid tumours that is thought to serve as the fuel for tumorigenic progression. How chromosome instability (CIN) arises in tumours and what consequences it has are still, however, hotly debated issues. Here we review the recent literature with an emphasis on models that recapitulate observations from human disease.

Indexed as

Chromosomal InstabilityDisease ProgressionMitosisAneuploidyAnimalsCell Transformation, NeoplasticChromosome BreakageHumansModels, GeneticNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID20094045
PMCPMC5526619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.