SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Interventions for preventing infectious complications in haemodialysis patients with central venous catheters.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- UK Kidney Association Clinical Practice Guideline on vascular access for haemodialysis.BMC nephrology · 2025Guideline
- Antimicrobial lock solutions for preventing catheter-related infections in haemodialysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Skin antisepsis for reducing central venous catheter-related infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents for preventing central venous haemodialysis catheter malfunction in patients with end-stage kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Catheter impregnation, coating or bonding for reducing central venous catheter-related infections in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Interventions for preventing infectious complications in haemodialysis patients with central venous catheters.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Trial
- Patterns and Outcomes of Permanent Vascular Access in End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Multicenter Experience.Cureus · 2025Article
- Doppler ultrasound surveillance of recently formed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistula: the SONAR observational cohort study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Observational
- Early Ultrasound Surveillance of Newly-Created Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula.Kidney international reports · 2024Article
- The Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness of Arteriovenous (AV) Fistula Screening in Haemodialysis Patients.Cureus · 2023Article
- REDUcing the burden of dialysis Catheter ComplicaTIOns: a National approach (REDUCCTION) - design and baseline results.Kidney360 · 2020Article
- Does Health Literacy of Hemodialyzed Patients Predict the Type of Their Vascular Access? A Cross-Sectional Study on Slovak Hemodialyzed Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Article
- Observational
- An Ointment Consisting of the Phage Lysin LysGH15 and Apigenin for Decolonization of Methicillin-ResistantViruses · 2018Article
- Neomycin Sulfate Improves the Antimicrobial Activity of Mupirocin-Based Antibacterial Ointments.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2016Article
- Practical Aspects of Nontunneled and Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2016Article
- Hemodialysis Tunneled Catheter-Related Infections.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2016Article
- A Cautionary Tale on the Central Venous Catheter: Medical Note for Oral Physicians.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCentral venous catheters (CVC) continue to play a prominent role in haemodialysis vascular access with 46% to 70% of patients commencing haemodialysis via a CVC. CVC access is associated with catheter-related infections, increased patient hospitalisations and death due to infection. A variety of interventions are used to prevent CVC infection.
objectivesTo evaluate the benefits and harms of prophylactic topical antimicrobials, topical antiseptics, medicated and non-medicated dressings on infectious complications among haemodialysis patients with CVC. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference lists of articles without language restriction. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs investigating any intervention that prevented infectious complications among haemodialysis patients with CVC. We excluded antimicrobial impregnated CVC or CVC using locking solutions with antimicrobial properties. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors assessed study quality and extracted data. Dichotomous outcomes were expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and continuous outcomes as mean differences (MD). MAIN
resultsTen studies (786 patients) were included. Mupirocin ointment reduced the risk of catheter-related bacteraemia (RR 0.17, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.43) and had a significant effect on catheter-related infections caused by S. aureus. The risk of catheter-related bacteraemia was reduced by polysporin (RR 0.40, 95%CI 0.19 to 0.86) and povidone-iodine ointment (RR 0.10, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.72). Subgroup analysis suggested mupirocin (RR 0.12, 95%CI 0.01 to 2.13) and povidone-iodine ointment (RR 0.84, 95%CI 0.24 to 2.98) had no effect on all-cause mortality while polysporin ointment showed a significant reduction (RR 0.22, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.74). Mortality related to infection was not reduced by mupirocin, polysporin or povidone-iodine ointment. Topical honey did not reduce the risk of exit site infection (RR 0.45, 95%CI 0.10 to 2.11) or catheter-related bacteraemia (RR 0.80, 95%CI 0.37 to 1.73). Transparent polyurethane dressing compared to dry gauze dressing did not reduce the risk of CVC or exit site infection, or catheter-related bacteraemia. AUTHORS'
conclusionsMupirocin ointment appears effective in reducing the risk of catheter-related bacteraemia. Insufficient reporting on mupirocin resistance was noted and needs to be considered in future studies. A lack of high quality data on the routine use of povidone-iodine ointment, polysporin ointment and topical honey warrant larger RCTs. Insufficient data were available to determine which dressing type (transparent polyurethane or dry gauze dressing) has the lowest risk of catheter-related infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.