Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20091574›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Antiepileptic drugs for the primary and secondary prevention of seizures after stroke.

Joseph Kwan, Emma Wood

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Symptomatic and palliative care for stroke survivors.Journal of general internal medicine · 2012
    Review
  10. Gabapentin: An update of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in epilepsy.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Joseph KwanSchool of Health and Social Care, Bournemouth University, Royal London House (Lansdowne Campus), Christchurch Road, Bournemouth, Dorset, UK, BH1 3LT.
Emma Wood
University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeizures after stroke are an important clinical problem, and they may be associated with poor outcome. The effects of antiepileptic drugs for the primary and secondary prevention of seizures after stroke remain unclear.

objectivesWe aimed to assess the effects of antiepileptic drugs for the primary and secondary prevention of seizures after stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Specialised Registers of the Cochrane Epilepsy Group and the Cochrane Stroke Group (2 July 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2009), and MEDLINE (1950 to June, week 4, 2009). We also checked the reference lists of articles retrieved from these searches. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials in which patients were assigned to treatment or control group (placebo or no drug). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both review authors independently screened all the titles, abstracts, and keywords of publications identified by the searches to assess their eligibility, and both review authors assessed their suitability for inclusion according to pre-specified selection criteria. No study was included, hence no data analysis was performed. MAIN

resultsWe did not find any randomised controlled trials that have compared the effects of antiepileptic drugs with placebo (or no drug) for the primary or secondary prevention of seizures after stroke. We did, however, find three randomised controlled trials that have assessed the effects of several different antiepileptic drugs for the secondary prevention of post-stroke seizures. The first study was performed in older adults (mean age 72 years) with a mixture of diagnoses including stroke (comparing carbamazepine, lamotrigine and gabapentin); the second study was performed in children and younger adults (mean age 38 years) with a mixture of diagnoses including stroke (comparing carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, gabapentin and topiramate); and the third study was performed in stroke patients only (comparing carbamazepine and lamotrigine). AUTHORS'

conclusionsCurrently, there is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of antiepileptic drugs for the primary or secondary prevention of seizures after stroke. Further well-conducted research is needed for this important clinical problem.

Indexed as

AgedAnticonvulsantsHumansSecondary PreventionSeizuresStrokeAnticonvulsants

Identifiers

PMID20091574
OpenAlexW4250978318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.