SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Interventions at caesarean section for reducing the risk of aspiration pneumonitis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05033041 (Comparison of Gastric Volumes by Gastric Ultrasound in Term Parturients Undergoing Scheduled Elective Cesarean Delivery With and Without Metoclopramide), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Gastric Volumes by Gastric Ultrasound in Term Parturients Undergoing Scheduled Elective Cesarean Delivery With and Without Metoclopramide
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions at caesarean section for reducing the risk of aspiration pneumonitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Restricting oral fluid and food intake during labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Interventions for preventing nausea and vomiting in women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange versus conventional facemask breathing for preoxygenation during anesthesia induction in TBI surgery: a randomized controlled trial.European journal of medical research · 2025Trial
- The Effect of Various Pre-Cesarean Fasting Times on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.Advanced biomedical research · 2022Article
- [Selection of the optimal anesthesia regimen for cesarean section].Der Anaesthesist · 2020Article
- Ultrasound your NPO: Effect of body mass index on gastric volume in term pregnant women - Retrospective case series.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2019Article
- Estimation of Gastric Volume Before Anesthesia in Term-Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section, Compared With Non-pregnant or First-Trimester Women Undergoing Minor Gynecological Surgical Procedures.Clinical medicine insights. Women's health · 2019Article
- [Anesthesia in obstetrics: Tried and trusted methods, current standards and new challenges].Der Anaesthesist · 2016Article
- Is anesthesia dangerous?Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2011Article
- Pneumonia complicating pregnancy.Clinics in chest medicine · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAspiration pneumonitis is a syndrome resulting from the inhalation of gastric contents. The incidence in obstetric anaesthesia has fallen, largely due to improved anaesthetic techniques and the increased use of regional anaesthesia at caesarean section. However, aspiration pneumonitis is still a cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, and it is important to use effective prophylaxis.
objectivesTo determine whether interventions given prior to caesarean section reduce the risk of aspiration pneumonitis in women with an uncomplicated pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (April 2009). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials were included. Quasi-randomised trials were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and carried out data extraction. Data entry was checked. MAIN
resultsTwenty-two studies, involving 2658 women, are included, all having a caesarean section under general anaesthesia. The studies covered a number of comparisons, but were mostly small and of unclear or poor quality.When compared to no treatment or placebo, there was a significant reduction in the risk of intragastric pH < 2.5 with antacids (risk ratio (RR) 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09 to 0.32, two studies, 108 women), H(2) antagonists (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.18, two studies, 170 women) and proton pump antagonists (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.46, one study 80 women). H(2) antagonists were associated with a reduced the risk of intragastric pH < 2.5 at intubation when compared with proton pump antagonists (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.97, one study, 120 women), but compared with antacids the findings were unclear. The combined use of 'antacids plus H(2) antagonists' was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of intragastric pH < 2.5 at intubation when compared with placebo (RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.15, one study, 89 women) or compared with antacids alone (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.92, one study, 119 women). AUTHORS'
conclusionsThe quality of the evidence was poor, but the findings suggest that the combination of antacids plus H(2) antagonists was more effective than no intervention, and superior to antacids alone in preventing low gastric pH. However, none of the studies assessed potential adverse effects or substantive clinical outcomes. These findings are relevant for all women undergoing caesarean section under general anaesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.