Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20091542›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Interventions for vitiligo.

Maxine E Whitton, Mariona Pinart, Jonathan Batchelor, Clare Lushey, Jo Leonardi-Bee, Urbà González

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01478945 (Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of Hand Held NB-UVB for the Treatment of Focal or Early Vitiligo at Home), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01478945 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of Hand Held NB-UVB for the Treatment of Focal or Early Vitiligo at Home

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2012 to 2013Enrolled29ConditionsVitiligoArms311 nm NB-UVB light
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. The use of lasers in vitiligo, an overview.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for vitiligo.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Treatment of vitiligo].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maxine E Whittonc/o Cochrane Skin Group, The University of Nottingham, Room A103, King's Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane, Nottingham, UK, NG7 2NR.
Mariona Pinart
Jonathan Batchelor
Clare Lushey
Jo Leonardi-Bee
Urbà González
University of Nottingham · GBHospital Plató · ESAddenbrooke's Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAround one per cent of the world's population has vitiligo, a disease which causes white patches on the skin. There are a variety of treatments available, most of which are unsatisfactory.

objectivesTo assess all interventions used to manage vitiligo. SEARCH STRATEGY: In November 2009 we updated searches of the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2009), MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, PsycINFO, LILACS and ongoing trials databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least 2 review authors independently assessed study eligibility and methodological quality, and carried out data extraction. Two of the 57 included studies could be combined for meta-analysis. MAIN

resultsIn this update, 57 trials, including 19 from the original review, were assessed with 3139 participants. Most of the RCTs, which covered a wide range of interventions, had fewer than 50 participants. All of the studies assessed repigmentation, 6 measured cessation of spread, and 5 investigated the effect of treatment on quality of life.Most of the studies assessed combination therapies which generally reported better results. New interventions include monochromatic excimer light (MEL), Polypodium leucotomos, melanocyte transplantation, oral antioxidants, Chinese zengse pill, and pimecrolimus. We analysed the data from 28 studies that met our outcome criteria of improvement in quality of life and greater than 75% repigmentation.Fifteen analyses from studies comparing various interventions showed a statistically significant difference between the proportions of participants achieving more than 75% repigmentation. The majority of analyses showing statistically significant differences were from studies that assessed combination interventions which generally included some form of light treatment.Topical preparations, in particular corticosteroids, reported most adverse effects. However, in the combination studies it was difficult to ascertain which treatment caused these effects. None of the studies was able to demonstrate long-term benefits. Very few studies were conducted on children or included segmental vitiligo. We found one study of psychological interventions and none evaluating micropigmentation, depigmentation, or cosmetic camouflage. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThis review has found some evidence from individual studies to support existing therapies for vitiligo, but the usefulness of the findings is limited by the different designs and outcome measurements and lack of quality of life measures. There is a need for follow-up studies to assess permanence of repigmentation as well as high quality randomised trials using standardised measures and which also address quality of life.

Indexed as

Combined Modality TherapyHumansPUVA TherapyQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSteroidsVitiligoSteroids

Identifiers

PMID20091542
OpenAlexW4211059122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.