Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20091538›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Advanced trauma life support training for ambulance crews.

Sudha Jayaraman, Dinesh Sethi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01603537 (Impact of Prehospital Trauma Life Support), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01603537 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Prehospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS) Training of Ambulance Caregivers on Outcome of Traffic Injury Victims

TypeobservationalSponsorUppsala University HospitalRan2011 to 2012Enrolled40,000ConditionsTraffic Accidents
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sudha JayaramanDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, S-321, 513 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94143.
Dinesh Sethi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an increasing global burden of injury especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To address this, models of trauma care initially developed in high income countries are being adopted in LMIC settings. In particular, ambulance crews with advanced life support (ALS) training are being promoted in LMICs as a strategy for improving outcomes for victims of trauma. However, there is controversy as to the effectiveness of this health service intervention and the evidence has yet to be rigorously appraised.

objectivesTo quantify the impact of ALS-trained ambulance crews versus crews without ALS training on reducing mortality and morbidity in trauma patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were not restricted by date, language or publication status. We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 3), MEDLINE (Ovid SP), EMBASE (Ovid SP), CINAHL (EBSCO) and PubMed in all years up to July 2009. We also searched the reference lists of relevant studies and reviews in order to identify unpublished material. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies, including before-and-after studies and interrupted time series studies, comparing the impact of ALS-trained ambulance crews versus crews without ALS training on the reduction of mortality and morbidity in trauma patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One review author applied eligibility criteria to trial reports for inclusion and extracted data. MAIN

resultsWe found one controlled before-and-after trial, one uncontrolled before-and-after study, and one randomised controlled trial that met the inclusion criteria. None demonstrated evidence to support ALS training for pre-hospital personnel. In the uncontrolled before-and-after study, 'a priori' sub-group analysis showed an increase in mortality among patients who had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of less than nine and received care from ALS trained ambulance crews. Additionally, when the pre-hospital trauma score was taken into account in logistic regression analysis, mortality in the patients receiving care from ALS trained crews increased significantly. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAt this time, the evidence indicates that there is no benefit of advanced life support training for ambulance crews.

Indexed as

Life Support CareAmbulancesControlled Clinical Trials as TopicEmergency Medical TechniciansHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTraumatology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.