Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20091512›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures.

Bonnie Stevens, Janet Yamada, Arne Ohlsson

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01368861 completednot on this map

Effective Analgesia Using the 5 S's During Routine Immunizations at 2 and 4 Months

TypeobservationalSponsorChildren's Hospital of The King's DaughtersRan2010 to 2012Enrolled230ConditionsPain
NCT01561547 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Maternal Analgesia for Procedural Pain in Preterm Neonates: Does It Remain Efficacious?

TypeinterventionalSponsorIWK Health CentreRan2012 to 2016Enrolled242ConditionsPain, DevelopmentArmsKangaroo Mother Care, Sucrose
NCT02984098 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

40% Orally Administered Dextrose Gel is More Effective Than 25% Dextrose But Not Sufficiently Reliefs Acute Pain in Term Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Targu Mures, RomaniaRan2014 to 2015Enrolled200ConditionsAcute PainArmsDextrose
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sucrose analgesia for heel-lance procedures in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  7. Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  8. Venepuncture versus heel lance for blood sampling in term neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Blinded randomized crossover trial: Skin-to-skin care vs. sucrose for preterm neonatal pain.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Infant colic: mechanisms and management.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018
    Review
  19. Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version).Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2018
    Article
  20. A Novel Role for the Periaqueductal Gray in Consummatory Behavior.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bonnie StevensAssociate Chief of Nursing Research, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8.
Janet Yamada
Arne Ohlsson
Hospital for Sick Children · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdministration of oral sucrose with and without non-nutritive sucking is frequently used as a non-pharmacological intervention for procedural pain relief in neonates.

objectivesTo determine the efficacy, effect of dose and safety of oral sucrose for relieving procedural pain in neonates. SEARCH STRATEGY: The standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Collaborative Review Group were used. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials in which term and/or preterm neonates (postnatal age maximum of 28 days corrected for postmenstrual age) received sucrose for procedural pain. Control conditions included water, pacifier, positioning/containing or breastfeeding. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The main outcome measures were physiological and/or behavioural pain indicators and/or composite pain scores. A weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the fixed effects model was reported for continuous outcome measures. MAIN

resultsForty-four studies enrolling 3,496 infants were included. Results from only a few studies could be combined in meta-analyses. Sucrose significantly reduced duration of total crying time (seconds) [WMD -39.26 (95% CI -44.29, -34.24), 88 neonates], but did not reduce duration of first cry (seconds) during heel lance [WMD -8.99 (95% CI -20.07, 2.10), 192 neonates]. No significant differences were found for percent change in heart rate from baseline at one minute [WMD 0.90 (95% CI -5.81, 7.61), 86 neonates] and three minutes [WMD -6.20 (95% CI -15.27, 2.88), 86 neonates] post-heel lance, or for mean heart rate at three minutes post-heel lance [WMD -0.98 (95% CI -8.29, 6.32), 154 neonates]. Oxygen saturation (%) was significantly lower in infants given sucrose during ROP examination compared to controls [WMD -2.58 (95% CI -4.94, - 0.23), 62 neonates]. Infants given sucrose post-heel lance had significantly lower PIPP scores at 30 seconds [WMD -1.64 (95% CI -2.47, - 0.81), 220 neonates] and 60 seconds [WMD -2.05 (95% CI -3.08, -1.02), 195 neonates]. For ROP exams, sucrose did not significantly reduce PIPP scores [WMD -0.65 (95% CI -1.88, 0.59), 82 neonates]. There were no differences in adverse effects between sucrose and control groups. AUTHORS'

conclusionsSucrose is safe and effective for reducing procedural pain from single events. An optimal dose could not be identified due to inconsistency in effective sucrose dosage among studies.Further investigation on repeated administration of sucrose in neonates and the use of sucrose in combination with other non-pharmacological (e.g. behavioural, physical) and pharmacologic interventions is needed. Sucrose use in extremely low birth-weight and unstable and/or ventilated neonates needs to be addressed.

Indexed as

PuncturesAnalgesicsHumansInfant, NewbornPainPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSucroseAnalgesicsSucrose

Identifiers

PMID20091512
OpenAlexW4239079633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.