ArticleHeart and vessels2010
Gender differences in the diagnosis and treatment of left ventricular hypertrophy detected by different electrocardiographic criteria. Findings from the SARA study.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Low-dose atorvastatin, losartan, and particularly their combination, provide cardiovascular protection in isolated rat heart and aorta.Heart and vessels · 2013Article
- A comparison of cornell and sokolow-lyon electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy in korean patients.Korean circulation journal · 2012Article
- Absence of left ventricular concentric hypertrophy: a prerequisite for zero coronary calcium score.Heart and vessels · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the influence of gender on the detection of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) by different electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria and the potential changes induced by antihypertensive therapy from the SARA study ("eStudio del trAtamiento con candesaRtan en pacientes con hipertensión Arterial según criterios electrocardiográficos") database. The SARA study was aimed to determine the effect of a 12-month candesartan-based regimen on ECG-LVH. Overall, 264 patients were included. Cornell voltage index (CorV), Cornell product (CorP), Sokolow-Lyon voltage index (SokV), and Sokolow-Lyon product (SokP) were calculated. At baseline, 39.3% of women and 15.4% of men exhibited ECG-LVH by CorP criteria, and 18.2% of women and 30.6% of men had LVH by SokP. When voltage criteria were applied, LVH was detected in 20.5% of women and 5.9% of men by CorV, and in 10.7% and 13.4%, respectively, by SokV. At the end of the study, the proportion of patients with ECG-LVH by CorP was 28.7% in women (P < 0.001) and 14.4% in men (P = not significant [n.s.]), and in 21.2% (P = n.s.) and 22.1% (P = 0.01) by SokP. Left ventricular hypertrophy by CorV were present in 17.9% of women and 9.0% of men (both P = 0.001), and in 10.6% and 13.3%, respectively by SokV (both P = n.s.). In ECG-LVH hypertensive patients, candesartan was an efficacious drug to regress LVH in the clinical practice setting. The voltage-duration product criteria suggestively detected ECG-LVH and its respective changes better than voltage criteria. Although in daily clinical practice the use of both product criteria seemed clearly preferable to voltage for assessment of ECG-LVH, the CorP appeared to be markedly more useful in women and SokP in men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.