Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20091350›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2010

Impact of preoperative positron emission tomography in patients with severely impaired LV-function undergoing surgical revascularization.

Johannes Boehm, Felix Haas, Robert Bauernschmitt, Stefan Wagenpfeil, Bernhard Voss, Markus Schwaiger, Rüdiger Lange

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cardiovascular imaging 2010 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2011
    Review
  3. Positron emission tomography; viable tool in patients pre-CABG?The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Johannes BoehmKlinik fuer Herz- und Gefaesschirurgie, Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636, Munich, Germany. johannesfboehm@googlemail.com
Felix Haas
Robert Bauernschmitt
Stefan Wagenpfeil
Bernhard Voss
Markus Schwaiger
Rüdiger Lange
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) offers an important therapeutic option but is still associated with high perioperative mortality. Although previous studies suggest a benefit from revascularization for patients with defined viability by a non-invasive technique, the role of viability assessment to determine suitability for revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy has not yet been defined. This study evaluates the hypothesis that the use of PET imaging in the decision-making process for CABG will improve postoperative patient survival. We reviewed 476 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (LV ejection fraction <or=0.35) who were considered candidates for CABG between 1994 and 2004 on the basis of clinical presentation and angiographic data. In a Standard Care Group, 298 patients underwent CABG. In a second PET-assisted management group of 178 patients, 152 patients underwent CABG (PET-CABG) and 26 patients were excluded from CABG because of lack of viability (PET-Alternatives). Primary endpoint was postoperative survival. There were two in hospital deaths in the PET-CABG (1.3%) and 30 (10.1%) in the Standard Care Group (P = 0.018). The survival rate after 1, 5 and 9.3 years was 92.0, 73.3 and 54.2% in the PET-CABG and 88.9, 62.2 and 35.5% in the Standard Care Group, respectively (P = 0.005). Cox-regression analysis revealed a significant influence on long-term survival of patient selection by viability assessment via PET (P = 0.008), of LV-function (P = 0.017), and age >70 (P = 0.016). Preoperative assessment of myocardial viability via PET identifies patients, who will benefit most from CABG.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassPositron-Emission TomographyVentricular Function, LeftAgedCardiomyopathiesChi-Square DistributionFemaleHospital MortalityHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaPatient SelectionPredictive Value of TestsPreoperative Care

Identifiers

PMID20091350
PMCPMC2852592
OpenAlexW2033699075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.