ReviewHerz2009
Risk stratification in electrical cardiomyopathies.
Review in Herz, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Primary and secondary prophylactic ICD therapy in congenital electrical and structural cardiomyopathies].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2015Review
- Left cardiac sympathetic denervation for the management of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias in young patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and long QT syndrome.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2013Article
- Arrhythmias: a ‘Schwartz score’ for short QT syndrome.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2011Article
- Ventricular arrhythmias: from risk assessment for sudden cardiac death to therapeutic intervention.Herz · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrical cardiomyopathies contain the long QT syndrome (LQTS), the short QT syndrome (SQTS), the Brugada syndrome, and the catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT). Patients diagnosed with an electrical cardiomyopathy have an increased risk of syncope and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Usually, we are dealing with young patients or even children. The prevalence of these diseases is low. No large prospective randomized studies exist with respect to outcome based on different clinical and genetic parameters. Thus, risk stratification in these patients is based on retrospective data from single- or multicenter registries.The implantable cardioverter defibrillator is the only reliable therapy in patients with Brugada syndrome and SQTS, as no pharmacological therapy has been proven to prevent SCD. In LQTS and CPVT, the primary therapy relies on beta-blockers. In high-risk patients, the ICD is indicated.In all electrical diseases, risk stratification is based on the clinical phenotype, including the electrocardiogram, the history of unexplained or disease-related syncope, and sudden cardiac arrest. In LQTS and CPVT, demographic data like age and gender are important factors for risk stratification. The genotype contributes to risk stratification only in LQTS and CPVT.Patients with electrical cardiomyopathies have to be risk-stratified individually based on the data and the current guidelines available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.