Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20091142›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2010

Promising new sources for pluripotent stem cells.

Christian Leeb, Marcin Jurga, Colin McGuckin, Richard Moriggl, Lukas Kenner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The effects of stem cells on burn wounds: a review.International journal of burns and trauma · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Induced pluripotent stem cells for spinal cord injury therapy: current status and perspective.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2013
    Review
  14. Mesenchymal dental stem cells in regenerative dentistry.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2012
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Stem Cell Therapy: A New Treatment for Burns?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2011
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian LeebLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Cancer Research, Währingerstrasse 13A, Vienna, Austria.
Marcin Jurga
Colin McGuckin
Richard Moriggl
Lukas Kenner
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Cancer Research · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent findings have placed stem cell research at the forefront of biomedical sciences. Basic research on embryonic stem cells (ESCs) has contributed to our knowledge about the developmental potential and plasticity of stem cells. Furthermore, it has raised hope to use these cells as potential source for regenerative medicine and tissue replacement after injury or disease. Unfortunately, ESCs can also form tumors and they are ethically controversial because they originate from human embryos. This review summarizes findings and therapeutic applications of ESCs and their alternatives: adult stem cells and iPS cells.

Indexed as

Embryo ResearchRegenerative MedicineStem Cell TransplantationAdult Stem CellsCord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationFetal BloodHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsPluripotent Stem CellsRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID20091142
OpenAlexW2000690585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.