ArticleGenetica2010
Comparative analysis of vertebrate PEPT1 and PEPT2 genes.
Article in Genetica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional and Physiological Implications of Oligopeptide Transporters: Potential Targets for Pharmacological Interventions.The Journal of membrane biology · 2025Review
- Molecular Insights to the Structure-Interaction Relationships of Human Proton-Coupled Oligopeptide Transporters (PepTs).Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Biology of Peptide Transporter 2 in Mammals: New Insights into Its Function, Structure and Regulation.Cells · 2022Review
- A synthetic BBB-permeable tripeptide GCF confers neuroprotection by increasing glycine in the ischemic brain.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Identification of PEPT2 as an important candidate molecule in 5-ALA-mediated fluorescence-guided surgery in WHO grade II/III gliomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2019Article
- Function, Regulation, and Pathophysiological Relevance of the POT Superfamily, Specifically PepT1 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Comprehensive Physiology · 2018Review
- Molecular identification and functional characteristics of peptide transporters in the bonnethead shark (Sphyrna tiburo).Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2016Article
- Conserved C-terminal nascent peptide binding domain of HYPK facilitates its chaperone-like activity.Journal of biosciences · 2014Article
- Divergent developmental expression and function of the proton-coupled oligopeptide transporters PepT2 and PhT1 in regional brain slices of mouse and rat.Journal of neurochemistry · 2014Article
- Proton-coupled oligopeptide transporter family SLC15: physiological, pharmacological and pathological implications.Molecular aspects of medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The plasma membrane transport proteins belong to SoLute Carrier 15 (SLC15) family and two members of this family have been characterized extensively in higher vertebrates, namely PEPT1 and PEPT2. Despite many efforts have made to define a pharmacophore model for efficient binding and transporting of substrates, there is not a comprehensive study performed to elucidate the evolutionary mechanisms among the SLC15 family members and to statistically evaluate sequence conservation and functional divergence between members. In this study, we compared and contrasted the rates and patterns of molecular evolution of 2 PEPT genes. Phylogenetic tree assembly with all available vertebrate PEPTs suggests that the PEPTs originated by duplications and diverged from a common protein at the base of the eukaryotic tree. Topological structure demonstrates both members share the similar hydrophobic domains (TMDs), which have been constrained by purifying selection. Although both genes show qualitatively similar patterns, their rates of evolution differ significantly due to an increased rate of synonymous substitutions in the structural domains in one copy, suggesting substantial differences in functional constraint on each gene. Site-specific profiles were established by posterior probability analysis revealing significantly divergent regions mainly locate at the hydrophobic region between predicted transmembrane domains 9 and 10 of the proteins. Thus, these results provide the evidence that several amino acid residues with reduced selective constraints are largely responsible for functional divergence between the paralogous PEPTs. These findings may provide a starting point for further experimental verifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.