Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20091082›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2010

Platelet-bacterial interactions.

Steven W Kerrigan, Dermot Cox

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Genome-based taxonomic identification and safety assessment of an Enterococcus strain isolated from a homemade dairy product.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. More than just teeth: How oral health can affect the heart.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The role of platelets in sepsis: A review.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Platelets andBiomedicines · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Microorganisms · 2020
    Review
  20. Drug TargetingSmall structures · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven W KerriganSchool of Pharmacy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Dermot Cox
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many bacteria are capable of interacting with platelets and inducing platelet aggregation. This interaction may be a direct interaction between a bacterial surface protein and a platelet receptor or may be an indirect interaction where plasma proteins bind to the bacterial surface and subsequently bind to a platelet receptor. However, these interactions usually do not trigger platelet activation as a secondary co-signal is also required. This is usually due to specific antibody bound to the bacteria interacting with FcgammaRIIa on the platelet surface. Secreted bacterial products such as gingipains and lipopolysaccharide may also be capable of triggering platelet activation.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial InfectionsBlood PlateletsCell MembraneHumansPlatelet AggregationReceptors, IgGThrombosisFc gamma receptor IIAReceptors, IgG

Identifiers

PMID20091082
PMCPMC11115587
OpenAlexW1982474751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.