Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20090834›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2010

Non-coding changes cause sex-specific wing size differences between closely related species of Nasonia.

David W Loehlin, Deodoro C S G Oliveira, Rachel Edwards, Jonathan D Giebel, Michael E Clark, M Victoria Cattani, Louis van de Zande, Eveline C Verhulst, Leo W Beukeboom, Monica Muñoz-Torres and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David W LoehlinDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Deodoro C S G Oliveira
Rachel Edwards
Jonathan D Giebel
Michael E Clark
M Victoria Cattani
Louis van de Zande
Eveline C Verhulst
Leo W Beukeboom
Monica Muñoz-Torres
John H Werren

Funding

Genetics of Wing and Cell-Size Evolution in NasoniaR01GM070026 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WERREN, JOHN HAYNES · 2005 to 2008
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01 GM070026NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic basis of morphological differences among species is still poorly understood. We investigated the genetic basis of sex-specific differences in wing size between two closely related species of Nasonia by positional cloning a major male-specific locus, wing-size1 (ws1). Male wing size increases by 45% through cell size and cell number changes when the ws1 allele from N. giraulti is backcrossed into a N. vitripennis genetic background. A positional cloning approach was used to fine-scale map the ws1 locus to a 13.5 kilobase region. This region falls between prospero (a transcription factor involved in neurogenesis) and the master sex-determining gene doublesex. It contains the 5'-UTR and cis-regulatory domain of doublesex, and no coding sequence. Wing size reduction correlates with an increase in doublesex expression level that is specific to developing male wings. Our results indicate that non-coding changes are responsible for recent divergence in sex-specific morphology between two closely related species. We have not yet resolved whether wing size evolution at the ws1 locus is caused by regulatory alterations of dsx or prospero, or by another mechanism. This study demonstrates the feasibility of efficient positional cloning of quantitative trait loci (QTL) involved in a broad array of phenotypic differences among Nasonia species.

Indexed as

Open Reading FramesQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsFemaleInsect ProteinsMalePhenotypeSex CharacteristicsWaspsWings, AnimalInsect Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20090834
PMCPMC2799512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.