Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20090435›Full record

ArticleThe Clinical journal of pain2010

Central processing of noxious somatic stimuli in patients with irritable bowel syndrome compared with healthy controls.

Steve Heymen, William Maixner, William E Whitehead, Rebecca R Klatzkin, Beth Mechlin, Kathleen C Light

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Clinical journal of pain, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02880332 (Endogenous Pain Processing and Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Children With Functional Abdominal Pain and Irritable Bowel Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02880332 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Endogenous Pain Processing and Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Children With Functional Abdominal Pain and Irritable Bowel Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorVrije Universiteit BrusselRan2017 to 2018Enrolled75ConditionsAbdominal Pain, Irritable Bowel SyndromeArmsUsual care, Pain Neuroscience education, Extra care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steve HeymenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, UNC Center for Functional Gastroenterology and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7080, USA. steve_heymen@med.unc.edu
William Maixner
William E Whitehead
Rebecca R Klatzkin
Beth Mechlin
Kathleen C Light
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USMotility (United States) · US

Funding

Risk Factors for Onset and Persistence of TMDU01DE017018 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DIATCHENKO, LUDA, FILLINGIM, ROGER B · 2005 to 2016
$35.9M
Vulvar Vestibulitis syndrome (VVS)P01NS045685 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MAIXNER, WILLIAM · 2004 to 2014
$12.5M
NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE017018NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS045685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare a central analgesic mechanism known as diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) using somatic test stimuli and somatic conditioning stimuli, (CS) in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients and healthy controls.

methodsParticipants were 48 premenopausal females (27 with IBS), mean age of 29 years. The phasic heat test stimulus (peak temperature, 50 degrees C) was applied to the left palm. The DNIC effect, which measured reductions in average pain ratings (APR) during counter irritation (submersion of the participant's right hand in painful 12 degrees C circulating water) compared with baseline, was compared between groups. In addition, a second, counterbalanced, CS protocol (right hand submerged in nonpainful 32 degrees C circulating water) was performed. Differences in APR between the 2 counterirritation protocols were compared between groups to control for nonspecific effects known to influence DNIC. Psychologic measures and cardiovascular reactivity were also assessed.

resultsIBS patients demonstrated smaller DNIC than controls (P=0.011, repeated measures analysis of variance), and greater state-anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, and anger-out expression (P<0.05). Group differences in DNIC were enhanced after controlling for nonspecific effects occurring during the nonpainful CS, and for psychologic measures (P=0.001, repeated measures analysis of covariance). There were no group differences in age, cardiovascular reactivity, APR, or pain ratings for the 12 degrees C CS. DISCUSSION: These data demonstrate deficient DNIC in IBS. This is the first study to adequately control for alternative explanations of pain reduction during counterirritation. Only by controlling for nonspecific effects can evidence of deficient DNIC be attributed to dysregulation in endogenous analgesic mechanisms.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceBlood PressureFemaleHeart RateHot TemperatureHumansHyperalgesiaIrritable Bowel SyndromePain ThresholdPhysical StimulationPsychometricsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID20090435
PMCPMC4321817
OpenAlexW2010829771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.