Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20090428›Full record

GuidelineAmerican journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation2010

Challenges and recommendations for placebo controls in randomized trials in physical and rehabilitation medicine: a report of the international placebo symposium working group.

Felipe Fregni, Marta Imamura, Hsin Fen Chien, Henry L Lew, Paulo Boggio, Ted J Kaptchuk, Marcelo Riberto, Wu Tu Hsing, Linamara Rizzo Battistella, Andrea Furlan and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Can new approaches to synthesising evidence help achieve a consensus in psychotherapy research?Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felipe FregniHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Marta Imamura
Hsin Fen Chien
Henry L Lew
Paulo Boggio
Ted J Kaptchuk
Marcelo Riberto
Wu Tu Hsing
Linamara Rizzo Battistella
Andrea Furlan
International placebo symposium working group
Harvard University · US

Funding

Mentoring and Research in Placebo Studies, Asian Medicine, and CAMK24AT004095 · NCCIH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KAPTCHUK, TED · 2007 to 2016
$1.4M
NCCIH NIH HHS K24 AT004095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared with other specialties, the field of physical and rehabilitation medicine has not received the deserved recognition from clinicians and researchers in the scientific community. One of the reasons is the lack of sound evidence to support the traditional physical and rehabilitation medicine treatments. The best way to change this disadvantage is through a well conducted clinical research, such as standard placebo- or sham-controlled randomized clinical trials. Therefore, having placebo groups in clinical trials is essential to improve the level of evidence-based practice in physical and rehabilitation medicine that ultimately translates to better clinical care. To address the challenges for the use of placebo in physical and rehabilitation medicine and randomized clinical trials and to create useful recommendations, we convened a working group during the inaugural International Symposium in Placebo (February 2009, in Sao Paulo, Brazil) in which the following topics were discussed: (1) current status of randomized clinical trials in physical and rehabilitation medicine, (2) challenges for the use of placebo in physical and rehabilitation medicine, (3) bioethics, (4) use of placebo in acupuncture trials and for the treatment of low-back pain, (5) mechanisms of placebo, and (6) insights from other specialties. The current article represents the consensus report from the working group.

Indexed as

AdultChildHumansPatient SelectionPhysical and Rehabilitation MedicinePlacebosProfessional-Patient RelationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRehabilitationPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID20090428
PMCPMC2900312
OpenAlexW1993582754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.