ArticleInternational journal of computational biology and drug design2009
Breaking the computational barrier: a divide-conquer and aggregate based approach for Alu insertion site characterisation.
Article in International journal of computational biology and drug design, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inferring the expression variability of human transposable element-derived exons by linear model analysis of deep RNA sequencing data.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Orangutan Alu quiescence reveals possible source element: support for ancient backseat drivers.Mobile DNA · 2012Article
- Genome-wide analysis of mobile genetic element insertion sites.Nucleic acids research · 2011Article
- Alu distribution and mutation types of cancer genes.BMC genomics · 2011Article
- LINE-1 activity as molecular basis for genomic instability associated with light exposure at night.Mobile genetic elementsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insertion site characterisation of Alu elements is an important problem in primate-specific bioinformatics research. Key characteristics of this challenging problem include: data are not in the pre-defined feature vectors for predictive model construction; without any prior knowledge, can we discover the general patterns that could exist and also make biological insights?; how to obtain the compact yet discriminative patterns given a search space of 4(200)? This paper provides an integrated algorithmic framework for fulfilling the above mining tasks. Compared to the benchmark biological study, our results provide a further refined analysis of the patterns involved in Alu insertion. In particular, we acquire a 200nt predictive profile around the primary insertion site which not only contains the widely accepted consensus, but also suggests a longer pattern (T(7)AA[G'A]AATAA. This pattern provides more insight into the favourable sequence variations allowed for preferred binding and cleavage by the L1 ORF2 endonuclease. The proposed method is general enough that can be also applied to other sequence detection problems, such as microRNA target prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.