ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2010
Subnuclear proteomics in colorectal cancer: identification of proteins enriched in the nuclear matrix fraction and regulation in adenoma to carcinoma progression.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanotechnology in Cancer Therapy: How Nanoparticles Are Shaping the Future of Personalized Treatment.ACS nano medicine · 2026Review
- Ion Channel-Extracellular Matrix Interplay in Colorectal Cancer: A Network-Based Approach to Tumor Microenvironment Remodeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- SFPQ Promotes Lung Cancer MalignancyFrontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Increased Collagen Type V α2 (COL5A2) in Colorectal Cancer is Associated with Poor Prognosis and Tumor Progression.OncoTargets and therapy · 2021Article
- DNA sensors, crucial receptors to resist pathogens, are deregulated in colorectal cancer and associated with initiation and progression of the disease.Journal of Cancer · 2020Article
- Proteomics of Colorectal Cancer: Tumors, Organoids, and Cell Cultures-A Minireview.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Review
- Altered transcriptional regulatory proteins in glioblastoma and YBX1 as a potential regulator of tumor invasion.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Nucleic acid sensing pattern recognition receptors in the development of colorectal cancer and colitis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017Review
- Article
- OLFM4, KNG1 and Sec24C identified by proteomics and immunohistochemistry as potential markers of early colorectal cancer stages.Clinical proteomics · 2017Article
- Cirrhosis related functionality characteristic of the fecal microbiota as revealed by a metaproteomic approach.BMC gastroenterology · 2016Article
- Multi-omics profile of the mouse dentate gyrus after kainic acid-induced status epilepticus.Scientific data · 2016Article
- Dissecting characteristics and dynamics of differentially expressed proteins during multistage carcinogenesis of human colorectal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Article
- Article
- Proteomic Profiling of Bifidobacterium bifidum S17 Cultivated Under In Vitro Conditions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
- Large scale systematic proteomic quantification from non-metastatic to metastatic colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Subnuclear domain proteins in cancer cells support the functions of RUNX2 in the DNA damage response.Journal of cell science · 2015Article
- Exosomal sorting of the viral oncoprotein LMP1 is restrained by TRAF2 association at signalling endosomes.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abnormalities in nuclear phenotype and chromosome structure are key features of cancer cells. Investigation of the protein determinants of nuclear subfractions in cancer may yield molecular insights into aberrant chromosome function and chromatin organization and in addition may yield biomarkers for early cancer detection. Here we evaluate a proteomics work flow for profiling protein constituents in subnuclear domains in colorectal cancer tissues and apply this work flow to a comparative analysis of the nuclear matrix fraction in colorectal adenoma and carcinoma tissue samples. First, we established the reproducibility of the entire work flow. In a reproducibility analysis of three nuclear matrix fractions independently isolated from the same colon tumor homogenate, 889 of 1,047 proteins (85%) were reproducibly identified at high confidence (minimally two peptides per protein at 99% confidence interval at the protein level) with an average coefficient of variance for the number of normalized spectral counts per protein of 30%. This indicates a good reproducibility of the entire work flow from biochemical isolation to nano-LC-MS/MS analysis. Second, using spectral counting combined with statistics, we identified proteins that are significantly enriched in the nuclear matrix fraction relative to two earlier fractions (the chromatin-binding and intermediate filament fractions) isolated from six colorectal tissue samples. The total data set contained 2,059 non-redundant proteins. Gene ontology mining and protein network analysis of nuclear matrix-enriched proteins revealed enrichment for proteins implicated in "RNA processing" and "mRNA metabolic process." Finally, an explorative comparison of the nuclear matrix proteome in colorectal adenoma and carcinoma tissues revealed many proteins previously implicated in oncogenesis as well as new candidates. A subset of these differentially expressed proteins also exhibited a corresponding change at the mRNA level. Together, the results show that subnuclear proteomics of tumor tissue is feasible and a promising avenue for exploring oncogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.