ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010
Prediction of the binding affinities of peptides to class II MHC using a regularized thermodynamic model.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- pMHChat, characterizing the interactions between major histocompatibility complex class II molecules and peptides with large language models and deep hypergraph learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- ConvNeXt-MHC: improving MHC-peptide affinity prediction by structure-derived degenerate coding and the ConvNeXt model.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Review
- Trans-Allelic Model for Prediction of Peptide:MHC-II Interactions.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Article
- Host genotype and time dependent antigen presentation of viral peptides: predictions from theory.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- MHC2MIL: a novel multiple instance learning based method for MHC-II peptide binding prediction by considering peptide flanking region and residue positions.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Learning a peptide-protein binding affinity predictor with kernel ridge regression.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- MHC2SKpan: a novel kernel based approach for pan-specific MHC class II peptide binding prediction.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- The utility and limitations of current Web-available algorithms to predict peptides recognized by CD4 T cells in response to pathogen infection.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2012Article
- Flanking residues are central to DO11.10 T cell hybridoma stimulation by ovalbumin 323-339.PloS one · 2012Article
- TEPITOPEpan: extending TEPITOPE for peptide binding prediction covering over 700 HLA-DR molecules.PloS one · 2012Article
- Peptide binding prediction for the human class II MHC allele HLA-DP2: a molecular docking approach.BMC structural biology · 2011Article
- Predicting peptide binding affinities to MHC molecules using a modified semi-empirical scoring function.PloS one · 2011Article
- Towards universal structure-based prediction of class II MHC epitopes for diverse allotypes.PloS one · 2010Article
- MultiRTA: a simple yet reliable method for predicting peptide binding affinities for multiple class II MHC allotypes.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe binding of peptide fragments of extracellular peptides to class II MHC is a crucial event in the adaptive immune response. Each MHC allotype generally binds a distinct subset of peptides and the enormous number of possible peptide epitopes prevents their complete experimental characterization. Computational methods can utilize the limited experimental data to predict the binding affinities of peptides to class II MHC.
resultsWe have developed the Regularized Thermodynamic Average, or RTA, method for predicting the affinities of peptides binding to class II MHC. RTA accounts for all possible peptide binding conformations using a thermodynamic average and includes a parameter constraint for regularization to improve accuracy on novel data. RTA was shown to achieve higher accuracy, as measured by AUC, than SMM-align on the same data for all 17 MHC allotypes examined. RTA also gave the highest accuracy on all but three allotypes when compared with results from 9 different prediction methods applied to the same data. In addition, the method correctly predicted the peptide binding register of 17 out of 18 peptide-MHC complexes. Finally, we found that suboptimal peptide binding registers, which are often ignored in other prediction methods, made significant contributions of at least 50% of the total binding energy for approximately 20% of the peptides.
conclusionsThe RTA method accurately predicts peptide binding affinities to class II MHC and accounts for multiple peptide binding registers while reducing overfitting through regularization. The method has potential applications in vaccine design and in understanding autoimmune disorders. A web server implementing the RTA prediction method is available at http://bordnerlab.org/RTA/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.