Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20087617›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2010

Prediction of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions using the modified Reid index.

Dae G Hong, Won J Seong, Sung Y Kim, Yoon S Lee, Young L Cho

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dae G HongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Graduate School of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.
Won J Seong
Sung Y Kim
Yoon S Lee
Young L Cho
Kyungpook National University Hospital · KRJeju National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColposcopic grading provides an objective and meaningful guide to histologic severity and neoplastic progression of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. The objective of this study was to develop a more efficient and convenient method to overcome procedural complexities involved with the traditional Reid index in prediction of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL).

methodsThe Reid index uses four colposcopic signs (margin, color, vessel, and iodine staining). The proposed modified Reid index system specifically incorporates the location of the lesion within the transformation zone in place of iodine staining. Three hundred women with suspected or abnormal cytologies or abnormal cervicographic findings were evaluated by colposcopy, directed biopsy, and HPV testing by the Hybrid Capture II method, which detects high-risk HPV DNA types.

resultsThe sensitivity of high-risk HPV testing for detecting HSIL was 94.4%, the specificity was 65.0%, the positive predictive value was 75.5%, and the negative predictive value was 91.0%. The results of the colposcopic impression using the modified Reid index were superior to HPV testing. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the colposcopic impression for detecting HSIL were 91.3, 92.9, 93.6, and 90.3% respectively.

conclusionThese results strongly indicate that the modified Reid index can accurately predict the histologic grade of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix and can be applied easily and objectively in clinical practice without affecting the diagnostic accuracy of the traditional Reid index.

Indexed as

BiopsyColposcopyDNA, ViralFemaleHumansPapillomaviridaeSensitivity and SpecificityUterine Cervical DysplasiaDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID20087617
OpenAlexW1981161087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.