Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20087461›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2009

The cladistic basis for the phylogenetic diversity (PD) measure links evolutionary features to environmental gradients and supports broad applications of microbial ecology's "phylogenetic beta diversity" framework.

Daniel P Faith, Catherine A Lozupone, David Nipperess, Rob Knight

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prophylactic Supplementation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Phylogenetics and the human microbiome.Systematic biology · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel P FaithThe Australian Museum, 6 College St., Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Catherine A LozuponeDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
David NipperessDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Rob KnightDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The PD measure of phylogenetic diversity interprets branch lengths cladistically to make inferences about feature diversity. PD calculations extend conventional species-level ecological indices to the features level. The "phylogenetic beta diversity" framework developed by microbial ecologists calculates PD-dissimilarities between community localities. Interpretation of these PD-dissimilarities at the feature level explains the framework's success in producing ordinations revealing environmental gradients. An example gradients space using PD-dissimilarities illustrates how evolutionary features form unimodal response patterns to gradients. This features model supports new application of existing species-level methods that are robust to unimodal responses, plus novel applications relating to climate change, commercial products discovery, and community assembly.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPhylogenyBacteriaBiological EvolutionEcological and Environmental Phenomenabacteriaclimate changeevolutionary featuresfeature diversityGEO BONordinationPD calculusUniFrac

Identifiers

PMID20087461
PMCPMC2808007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.