Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20086162›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2010

Pharmacokinetics of chloroquine and monodesethylchloroquine in pregnancy.

Harin A Karunajeewa, Sam Salman, Ivo Mueller, Francisca Baiwog, Servina Gomorrai, Irwin Law, Madhu Page-Sharp, Stephen Rogerson, Peter Siba, Kenneth F Ilett and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Broad-spectrum Respiratory Virus Entry Inhibitors.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Relationship of COVID-19 with pregnancy.Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology · 2021
    Review
  10. Exploring insights of hydroxychloroquine, a controversial drug in Covid-19: An update.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. COVID-19 Pandemic and Pregnancy in Kidney Disease.Advances in chronic kidney disease · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and pregnancy.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Harin A KarunajeewaSchool of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Sam Salman
Ivo Mueller
Francisca Baiwog
Servina Gomorrai
Irwin Law
Madhu Page-Sharp
Stephen Rogerson
Peter Siba
Kenneth F Ilett
Timothy M E Davis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to determine the pharmacokinetic disposition of chloroquine (CQ) and its active metabolite, desethylchloroquine (DECQ), when administered as intermittent presumptive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) for malaria, 30 Papua New Guinean women in the second or third trimester of pregnancy and 30 age-matched nonpregnant women were administered three daily doses of 450 mg CQ (8.5 mg/kg of body weight/day) in addition to a single dose of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. For all women, blood was taken at baseline; at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 48, and 72 h posttreatment; and at 7, 10, 14, 28, and 42 days posttreatment. Plasma was subsequently assayed for CQ and DECQ by high-performance liquid chromatography, and population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed. Pregnant subjects had significantly lower area under the plasma concentration-time curve for both CQ (35,750 versus 47,892 microg.h/liter, P < 0.001) and DECQ (23,073 versus 41,584 microg.h/liter, P < 0.001), reflecting significant differences in elimination half-lives and in volumes of distribution and clearances relative to bioavailability. Reduced plasma concentrations of both CQ and DECQ could compromise both curative efficacy and posttreatment prophylactic properties in pregnant patients. Higher IPTp CQ doses may be desirable but could increase the risk of adverse hemodynamic effects.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntimalarialsArea Under CurveBayes TheoremChloroquineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMalaria, FalciparumModels, BiologicalPapua New GuineaPlasmodium falciparumPregnancyPregnancy Complications, ParasiticAntimalarialsChloroquinedesethylchloroquine

Identifiers

PMID20086162
PMCPMC2825967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.