Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20086150›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2010

New susceptibility breakpoints for first-line antituberculosis drugs based on antimicrobial pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic science and population pharmacokinetic variability.

Tawanda Gumbo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Non-commercial phenotypic assays for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance: a systematic review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. A systematic review and meta-analysis of first-line tuberculosis drug concentrations and treatment outcomes.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Therapeutic drug monitoring in tuberculosis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  11. Role of therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tawanda GumboDivision of Infectious Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9113, USA. Tawanda.Gumbo@UTSouthwestern.edu

Funding

Efflux pump inhibitors to reduce duration of antituberculosis therapyDP2OD001886 · OD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GUMBO, TAWANDA · 2007 to 2007
$2.4M
PK-PD of combination antituberculosis therapy for suppression of drug-resistanceR01AI079497 · NIAID · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GUMBO, TAWANDA · 2008 to 2011
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI079497NIAID NIH HHS R01AI079497NIH HHS 1 DP2 OD001886NIH HHS DP2 OD001886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arguably, one of the most common and consequential laboratory tests performed in the world is Mycobacterium tuberculosis susceptibility testing. M. tuberculosis resistance is defined by growth of > or =1% of a bacillary inoculum on the critical concentration of an antibiotic. The critical concentration was chosen based on inhibition of > or =95% of wild-type isolates. The critical concentration of isoniazid is either 0.2 or 1.0 mg/liter, that of rifampin is 1.0 mg/liter, that of pyrazinamide is 100 mg/liter, that of ethambutol is 5.0 mg/liter, and that of fluoroquinolones is 1.0 mg/liter. However, the relevance of these concentrations to microbiologic and clinical outcomes is unclear. Critical concentrations were identified using the ability to achieve the antibiotic area under the concentration-time curve/MIC ratio associated with > or =90% of maximal kill (EC(90)) of M. tuberculosis in > or =90% of patients. Population pharmacokinetic parameters and their variability encountered in tuberculosis patients were utilized in Monte Carlo simulations to determine the probability that particular daily doses of the drugs would achieve or exceed the EC(90) in the epithelial lining fluid of 10,000 tuberculosis patients. Failure to achieve EC(90) in > or =90% of patients at a particular MIC was defined as drug resistance. The critical concentrations of moxifloxacin and ethambutol remained unchanged, but a critical concentration of 50 mg/liter was identified for pyrazinamide, 0.0312 mg/liter and 0.125 mg/liter were defined for low- and high-level isoniazid resistance, respectively, and 0.0625 mg/liter was defined for rifampin. Thus, current critical concentrations of first-line antituberculosis drugs are overoptimistic and should be set lower. With the proposed breakpoints, the rates of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis could become 4-fold higher than currently assumed.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsAza CompoundsDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEthambutolFluoroquinolonesHumansIn Vitro TechniquesIsoniazidMicrobial Sensitivity TestsModels, BiologicalMonte Carlo MethodMoxifloxacinMycobacterium tuberculosisPyrazinamideQuinolinesAntitubercular AgentsAza CompoundsEthambutolFluoroquinolonesIsoniazidMoxifloxacinPyrazinamideQuinolinesRifampin

Identifiers

PMID20086150
PMCPMC2849358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.