Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20085927›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2010

Quantitative analysis of cellular inflammation after traumatic spinal cord injury: evidence for a multiphasic inflammatory response in the acute to chronic environment.

Kevin D Beck, Hal X Nguyen, Manuel D Galvan, Desirée L Salazar, Trent M Woodruff, Aileen J Anderson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 372 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
372citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
19.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

372 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 639 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

312 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kevin D BeckAnatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4292, USA.
Hal X Nguyen
Manuel D Galvan
Desirée L Salazar
Trent M Woodruff
Aileen J Anderson
University of California, Irvine · USThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Mechanisms of Complement-Mediated Damage in SCIR01NS043428 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI ANDERSON, AILEEN J · 2003 to 2007
$1.8M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCET32NS007444 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LANDER, ARTHUR D · 1997 to 2007
$903k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS43428-01NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic injury to the central nervous system results in the disruption of the blood brain/spinal barrier, followed by the invasion of cells and other components of the immune system that can aggravate injury and affect subsequent repair and regeneration. Although studies of chronic neuroinflammation in the injured spinal cord of animals are clinically relevant to most patients living with traumatic injury to the brain or spinal cord, very little is known about chronic neuroinflammation, though several studies have tested the role of neuroinflammation in the acute period after injury. The present study characterizes a novel cell preparation method that assesses, quickly and effectively, the changes in the principal immune cell types by flow cytometry in the injured spinal cord, daily for the first 10 days and periodically up to 180 days after spinal cord injury. These data quantitatively demonstrate a novel time-dependent multiphasic response of cellular inflammation in the spinal cord after spinal cord injury and are verified by quantitative stereology of immunolabelled spinal cord sections at selected time points. The early phase of cellular inflammation is comprised principally of neutrophils (peaking 1 day post-injury), macrophages/microglia (peaking 7 days post-injury) and T cells (peaking 9 days post-injury). The late phase of cellular inflammation was detected after 14 days post-injury, peaked after 60 days post-injury and remained detectable throughout 180 days post-injury for all three cell types. Furthermore, the late phase of cellular inflammation (14-180 days post-injury) did not coincide with either further improvements, or new decrements, in open-field locomotor function after spinal cord injury. However, blockade of chemoattractant C5a-mediated inflammation after 14 days post-injury reduced locomotor recovery and myelination in the injured spinal cord, suggesting that the late inflammatory response serves a reparative function. Together, these data provide new insight into cellular inflammation of spinal cord injury and identify a surprising and extended multiphasic response of cellular inflammation. Understanding the role of this multiphasic response in the pathophysiology of spinal cord injury could be critical for the design and implementation of rational therapeutic treatment strategies, including both cell-based and pharmacological interventions.

Indexed as

Evaluation Studies as TopicAcute DiseaseAnimalsChronic DiseaseFemaleInflammationInflammation MediatorsMacrophagesNeutrophilsPeptides, CyclicRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptor, Anaphylatoxin C5aSpinal Cord InjuriesThoracic VertebraeTime Factorshydrocinnamate-cyclo(ornithyl-prolyl-cyclohexylalanyl-tryptophyl-arginyl)Inflammation MediatorsPeptides, CyclicReceptor, Anaphylatoxin C5a

Identifiers

PMID20085927
PMCPMC2858013
OpenAlexW2010882645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.