Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20084540›Full record

Trial reportCancer causes & control : CCC2010

A multi-center prospective cohort study of benign breast disease and risk of subsequent breast cancer.

Geoffrey C Kabat, Joan G Jones, Neal Olson, Abdissa Negassa, Catherine Duggan, Mindy Ginsberg, Rita A Kandel, Andrew G Glass, Thomas E Rohan

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Advancing Evidence of the Associations between specific Benign Breast Diagnoses and Future Breast Cancer Risk.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Geoffrey C KabatDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA. geoffrey.kabat@einstein.yu.edu
Joan G Jones
Neal Olson
Abdissa Negassa
Catherine Duggan
Mindy Ginsberg
Rita A Kandel
Andrew G Glass
Thomas E Rohan
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USKaiser Permanente · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USMount Sinai Hospital · CAPresbyterian Hospital · US

Funding

P53 in BBD and Breast Cancer Risk: A Multicenter CohortR01CA095661 · NCI · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI ROHAN, THOMAS E · 2002 to 2006
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095661NCI NIH HHS R01-CA95661-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe used a nested case-control design within a large, multi-center cohort of women who underwent a biopsy for benign breast disease (BBD) to assess the association of broad histologic groupings and specific histologic entities with risk of breast cancer.

methodsCases were all women who had a biopsy for BBD and who subsequently developed breast cancer; controls were individually matched to cases and were women with a biopsy for BBD who did not develop breast cancer in the same follow-up interval as that for the cases. After exclusions, 1,239 records (615 cases and 624 controls) were available for analysis. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsRelative to non-proliferative BBD/normal pathology, the multivariable-adjusted odds ratio for proliferative lesions without atypia was 1.45 (95% CI 1.10-1.90), and that for atypical hyperplasia was 5.27 (95% CI 2.29-12.15). The presence of multiple foci of columnar cell hyperplasia and of complex fibroadenoma without atypia was associated with a non-significantly increased risk of breast cancer, whereas sclerosing adenosis, radial scar, and papilloma showed no association with risk.

conclusionOur results indicate that, compared to women with normal pathology/non-proliferative disease, women with proliferative disease without atypia have a modestly increased risk of breast cancer, whereas women with atypical hyperplasia have a substantially increased risk.

Indexed as

Breast DiseasesBiopsyBreast NeoplasmsCicatrixCohort StudiesFemaleFibroadenomaFibrocystic Breast DiseaseHumansHyperplasiaLogistic ModelsOdds RatioPapillomaPrecancerous ConditionsProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID20084540
PMCPMC2873161
OpenAlexW2021385203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.