Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20084285›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Sex pheromone receptor specificity in the European corn borer moth, Ostrinia nubilalis.

Kevin W Wanner, Andrew S Nichols, Jean E Allen, Peggy L Bunger, Stephen F Garczynski, Charles E Linn, Hugh M Robertson, Charles W Luetje

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A covalent recognition strategy enables conspecific mate identification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Dibutyl phthalate released by solitary female locusts mediates sexual communication at low density.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kevin W WannerDepartment of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA. kwanner@montana.edu
Andrew S Nichols
Jean E Allen
Peggy L Bunger
Stephen F Garczynski
Charles E Linn
Hugh M Robertson
Charles W Luetje

Funding

Binding Site Structure of Insect Odorant Receptors.R01DC011091 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LUETJE, CHARLES WARD · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Ligand Recognition Among Mammalian Odorant ReceptorsR01DC008119 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LUETJE, CHARLES WARD · 2008 to 2010
$972k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC008119NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008119NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe European corn borer (ECB), Ostrinia nubilalis (Hubner), exists as two separate sex pheromone races. ECB(Z) females produce a 97ratio3 blend of Z11- and E11-tetradecenyl acetate whereas ECB(E) females produce an opposite 1ratio99 ratio of the Z and E isomers. Males of each race respond specifically to their conspecific female's blend. A closely related species, the Asian corn borer (ACB), O. furnacalis, uses a 3ratio2 blend of Z12- and E12-tetradecenyl acetate, and is believed to have evolved from an ECB-like ancestor. To further knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of pheromone detection and its evolution among closely related species we identified and characterized sex pheromone receptors from ECB(Z). METHODOLOGY: Homology-dependent (degenerate PCR primers designed to conserved amino acid motifs) and homology-independent (pyrophosphate sequencing of antennal cDNA) approaches were used to identify candidate sex pheromone transcripts. Expression in male and female antennae was assayed by quantitative real-time PCR. Two-electrode voltage clamp electrophysiology was used to functionally characterize candidate receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes.

conclusionWe characterized five sex pheromone receptors, OnOrs1 and 3-6. Their transcripts were 14-100 times more abundant in male compared to female antennae. OnOr6 was highly selective for Z11-tetradecenyl acetate (EC(50) = 0.86+/-0.27 microM) and was at least three orders of magnitude less responsive to E11-tetradecenyl acetate. Surprisingly, OnOr1, 3 and 5 responded to all four pheromones tested (Z11- and E11-tetradecenyl acetate, and Z12- and E12-tetradecenyl acetate) and to Z9-tetradecenyl acetate, a behavioral antagonist. OnOr1 was selective for E12-tetradecenyl acetate based on an efficacy that was at least 5-fold greater compared to the other four components. This combination of specifically- and broadly-responsive pheromone receptors corresponds to published results of sensory neuron activity in vivo. Receptors broadly-responsive to a class of pheromone components may provide a mechanism for variation in the male moth response that enables population level shifts in pheromone blend use.

Indexed as

MothsAnimalsFemaleMalePolymerase Chain ReactionReceptors, OdorantSex AttractantsSexual Behavior, AnimalReceptors, OdorantSex Attractants

Identifiers

PMID20084285
PMCPMC2801615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.