Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20084261›Full record

ArticlePaediatrics & child health2001

Interobserver variability of croup scoring in clinical practice.

A Chan, J Langley, J Leblanc

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Glucocorticoids for croup in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Glucocorticoids for croup in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Croup in children.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2013
    Review
  9. Croup.Lancet (London, England) · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A ChanDepartments of Pediatrics and Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University and the Clinical TrialsResearch Centre - Infectious Diseases, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
J Langley
J Leblanc
Dalhousie University · CAIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundViral laryngotracheobronchitis croup is the most common cause of acute upper airway obstruction in young children. Clinical assessment of children with croup is often performed using 'croup scores'; however, these scores have not been validated outside of the research setting.

objectiveTo determine the reliability of clinical observation items in croup scores in a paediatric emergency department (ED) setting.

designLiterature review identified 12 observation items (level of consciousness or mental status, inspiratory breath sounds, air entry, stridor, cough, cyanosis or colour, anxiety or air hunger, retractions and/or flaring, respiratory rate and heart rate, oxygen saturation and respiratory distress); overlapping items were combined, yielding 10 variables. In a prospective cohort study over 13 months, patients presenting with croup were observed independently, and croup scores were assigned by the triage nurse, ED nurse and the ED physician before treatment. Agreement among observers for clinical observations was analysed using Cohen's quadratic weighted kappa.

settingUniversity-affiliated, paediatric hospital ED providing primary care to an urban area (population 330,000). PATIENTS: Children aged three months to five years presenting with viral croup (preceding history of at least one day of upper respiratory tract symptoms associated with barking cough and/or hoarseness and/or stridor).

resultsOne hundred fifty-eight children meeting inclusion criteria for croup were assessed by three observers within 1 h of each other's assesments and before treatment. Interobserver agreement among the three observers using weighted kappa was greater than chance for all clinical observation items and ranged from fair to moderate (0.2 to 0.4 and 0.4 to 0.6, respectively).

conclusionsIn the busy practice setting of a paediatric ED, substantial interobserver variability exists among health care providers in the measurement of respiratory signs associated with croup in young children. Based on the present study in a practice setting and two research studies, the most reliable items of all of the published items included in croup scoring systems were stridor and retractions.

Indexed as

CroupHealth measurement scaleViral laryngotracheobronchitis

Identifiers

PMID20084261
PMCPMC2804760
OpenAlexW143383958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.