Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20083689›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatology2010

Incidence of dermatomyositis and clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota.

Margo J Bendewald, David A Wetter, Xujian Li, Mark D P Davis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 307 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Digital ulcerations in amyopathic dermatomyositis.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The caregiver burden of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Margo J BendewaldMayo Medical School, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
David A Wetter
Xujian Li
Mark D P Davis
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

ROCHESTER EPIDEMIOLOGY PROJECTR01AR030582 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROCCA, WALTER A · 1986 to 2009
$5.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR030582NIAMS NIH HHS R01-AR30582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify new and existing cases of dermatomyositis and its subtypes in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from 1976 through 2007, and to establish a population-based estimate of the incidence and prevalence of dermatomyositis and amyopathic dermatomyositis.

designRetrospective population-based study.

settingCommunity-based epidemiology project. Patients Patients with a diagnosis of dermatomyositis were identified from the Rochester Epidemiology Project.

main outcome measuresIncidence of dermatomyositis and clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis and risk of malignancy in clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis.

resultsOf the 29 patients identified, 6 (21%) had the clinically amyopathic subtype of dermatomyositis and 22 (76%) were female. Overall age- and sex-adjusted incidence of dermatomyositis including all subtypes was 9.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.09-13.17) per 1 million persons and 2.08 (95% CI, 0.39-3.77) per 1 million persons for clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis. Age- and sex-adjusted prevalence for all subtypes of dermatomyositis was 21.42 (95% CI, 13.07-29.77) per 100,000 persons. Eight patients (28%) had a malignant condition during the study period; the risk of malignancy (odds ratio) for classic dermatomyositis compared with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis was 4.61 but was not statistically significant (95% CI, 0.22-96.09) (P=.44).

conclusionsDermatomyositis is a rare disease, and clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis represents an estimated 20% of all dermatomyositis cases. Larger population-based studies are needed to estimate the risk of malignancy associated with subtypes of dermatomyositis, particularly clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis.

Indexed as

AdultAge DistributionAge of OnsetBiopsyDermatomyositisFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMinnesotaMuscle, SkeletalParaneoplastic SyndromesPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID20083689
PMCPMC2886726
OpenAlexW2044532917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.