Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20083638›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2010

Developmental plasticity and the evolution of animal complex life cycles.

Alessandro Minelli, Giuseppe Fusco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Journal of genomics · 2018
    Article
  10. Predicting phenological shifts in a changing climate.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Phenotypic plasticity in development and evolution: facts and concepts. Introduction.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alessandro MinelliDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, Via U. Bassi 58/B, I-35131 Padova, Italy. alessandro.minelli@unipd.it
Giuseppe Fusco

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metazoan life cycles can be complex in different ways. A number of diverse phenotypes and reproductive events can sequentially occur along the cycle, and at certain stages a variety of developmental and reproductive options can be available to the animal, the choice among which depends on a combination of organismal and environmental conditions. We hypothesize that a diversity of phenotypes arranged in developmental sequence throughout an animal's life cycle may have evolved by genetic assimilation of alternative phenotypes originally triggered by environmental cues. This is supported by similarities between the developmental mechanisms mediating phenotype change and alternative phenotype determination during ontogeny and the common ecological condition that favour both forms of phenotypic variation. The comparison of transcription profiles from different developmental stages throughout a complex life cycle with those from alternative phenotypes in closely related polyphenic animals is expected to offer critical evidence upon which to evaluate our hypothesis.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGrowth and DevelopmentLife Cycle StagesAnimalsCell DifferentiationEcosystemEnvironmentModels, BiologicalPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID20083638
PMCPMC2817148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.