Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20083436›Full record

ArticleTrends in parasitology2010

The perils of PCR: can we accurately 'correct' antimalarial trials?

Jonathan J Juliano, Nahla Gadalla, Colin J Sutherland, Steven R Meshnick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in parasitology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Adherence to Mass Drug Administration with Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine andThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan J JulianoDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Nahla Gadalla
Colin J Sutherland
Steven R Meshnick

Funding

UNC Clinical Translation Science Award-K12 Scholars Program (KL2)KL2RR025746 · NCRR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RUNGE, MARSCHALL S. · 2008 to 2011
$9.0M
Prevalence and fitness of drug resistant minority variant mutations in PlasmodiumR21AI076785 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MESHNICK, STEVEN RICHARD · 2008 to 2009
$404k
NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR025746NCRR NIH HHS KL2RR025746NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI076785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During follow-up in antimalarial drug trials, treated subjects can be newly infected. PCR correction is used to distinguish this re-infection from drug failure (recrudescence) and to adjust final drug efficacy estimates. The epidemiological, biological and technical limitations of PCR correction and how this can lead to misclassification in drug trial outcomes are underappreciated. This article considers these limitations and proposes a framework for reporting, interpreting and improving PCR correction of antimalarial trials.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsClinical Trials as TopicHumansMalariaPolymerase Chain ReactionAntimalarials

Identifiers

PMID20083436
PMCPMC2844636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.