Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20082725›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2010

Delivering an evidence-based outdoor journey intervention to people with stroke: barriers and enablers experienced by community rehabilitation teams.

Annie McCluskey, Sandy Middleton

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03500250 (Feasibility of a Nurse-led Intervention for the Early Management of Depression After Stroke in Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03500250 completednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility of a Nurse-led Intervention for the Early Management of Depression After Stroke in Hospital

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of Applied Sciences UtrechtRan2012 to 2013Enrolled120ConditionsDepression, StrokeArmsPost-Stroke Depression toolkit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development of the Translating Allied Health Knowledge (TAHK) Framework.International journal of health policy and management · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Annie McCluskeyCommunity-Based Health Care Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. annie.mccluskey@sydney.edu.au
Sandy Middleton

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransferring knowledge from research into practice can be challenging, partly because the process involves a change in attitudes, roles and behaviour by individuals and teams. Helping teams to identify then target potential barriers may aid the knowledge transfer process. The aim of this study was to identify barriers and enablers, as perceived by allied health professionals, to delivering an evidence-based (Level 1) outdoor journey intervention for people with stroke.

methodsA qualitative design and semi-structured interviews were used. Allied health professionals (n = 13) from two community rehabilitation teams were interviewed, before and after receiving feedback from a medical record audit and attending a training workshop. Interviews allowed participants to identify potential and actual barriers, as well as enablers to delivering the intervention. Qualitative data were analysed using theoretical domains described by Michie and colleagues.

resultsTwo barriers to delivery of the intervention were the social influence of people with stroke and their family, and professionals' beliefs about their capabilities. Other barriers included professionals' knowledge and skills, their role identity, availability of resources, whether professionals remembered to provide the intervention, and how they felt about delivering the intervention. Enablers to delivering the intervention included a belief that they could deliver the intervention, a willingness to expand and share professional roles, procedures that reminded them what to do, and feeling good about helping people with stroke to participate.

conclusionsThis study represents one step in the quality improvement process. The interviews encouraged reflection by staff. We obtained valuable data which have been used to plan behaviour change interventions addressing identified barriers. Our methods may assist other researchers who need to design similar behaviour change interventions.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineStroke RehabilitationTechnology TransferAllied Health PersonnelAustraliaClinical CompetenceCommunity Health ServicesEnvironmentFamilyHumansInterviews as TopicPhysical Therapy SpecialtyProfessional Role

Identifiers

PMID20082725
PMCPMC2821384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.