Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20082721›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

Proteomic analysis of peach fruit mesocarp softening and chilling injury using difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE).

Ricardo Nilo, Carlos Saffie, Kathryn Lilley, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, Verónica Cambiazo, Reinaldo Campos-Vargas, Mauricio González, Lee A Meisel, Julio Retamales, Herman Silva and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
25.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. On the Edge of Dispensability, the ChloroplastInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Comparative Analysis ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Plant catalases as NO and HRedox biology · 2020
    Review
  12. Sweet Pepper (Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Response of COPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ricardo NiloCentro de Biotecnología Vegetal, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, Chile.
Carlos Saffie
Kathryn Lilley
Ricardo Baeza-Yates
Verónica Cambiazo
Reinaldo Campos-Vargas
Mauricio González
Lee A Meisel
Julio Retamales
Herman Silva
Ariel Orellana
University of Chile · CLMillennium Engineering and Integration (United States) · USUniversidad Andrés Bello · CLUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeach fruit undergoes a rapid softening process that involves a number of metabolic changes. Storing fruit at low temperatures has been widely used to extend its postharvest life. However, this leads to undesired changes, such as mealiness and browning, which affect the quality of the fruit. In this study, a 2-D DIGE approach was designed to screen for differentially accumulated proteins in peach fruit during normal softening as well as under conditions that led to fruit chilling injury.

resultsThe analysis allowed us to identify 43 spots -representing about 18% of the total number analyzed- that show statistically significant changes. Thirty-nine of the proteins could be identified by mass spectrometry. Some of the proteins that changed during postharvest had been related to peach fruit ripening and cold stress in the past. However, we identified other proteins that had not been linked to these processes. A graphical display of the relationship between the differentially accumulated proteins was obtained using pairwise average-linkage cluster analysis and principal component analysis. Proteins such as endopolygalacturonase, catalase, NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase, pectin methylesterase and dehydrins were found to be very important for distinguishing between healthy and chill injured fruit. A categorization of the differentially accumulated proteins was performed using Gene Ontology annotation. The results showed that the 'response to stress', 'cellular homeostasis', 'metabolism of carbohydrates' and 'amino acid metabolism' biological processes were affected the most during the postharvest.

conclusionsUsing a comparative proteomic approach with 2-D DIGE allowed us to identify proteins that showed stage-specific changes in their accumulation pattern. Several proteins that are related to response to stress, cellular homeostasis, cellular component organization and carbohydrate metabolism were detected as being differentially accumulated. Finally, a significant proportion of the proteins identified had not been associated with softening, cold storage or chilling injury-altered fruit before; thus, comparative proteomics has proven to be a valuable tool for understanding fruit softening and postharvest.

Indexed as

Cold TemperatureChromatography, LiquidCluster AnalysisElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalFruitMultivariate AnalysisPlant ProteinsPrincipal Component AnalysisProteomicsPrunusTandem Mass SpectrometryPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20082721
PMCPMC2822761
OpenAlexW2145050311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.