Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20082696›Full record

Trial reportTrials2010

Multi-centre cluster randomised trial comparing a community group exercise programme with home based exercise with usual care for people aged 65 and over in primary care: protocol of the ProAct 65+ trial.

Steve Iliffe, Denise Kendrick, Richard Morris, Dawn Skelton, Heather Gage, Susie Dinan, Zoe Stevens, Mirilee Pearl, Tahir Masud

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Face-to-face interventions for promoting physical activity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Promoting physical activity in older people in general practice: ProAct65+ cluster randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Primary health care research & development · 2019
    Article
  18. Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Steve IliffeDepartment of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Rowland Hill St, London NW3 2PF, UK. s.iliffe@pcps.ucl.ac.uk
Denise Kendrick
Richard Morris
Dawn Skelton
Heather Gage
Susie Dinan
Zoe Stevens
Mirilee Pearl
Tahir Masud
Roland Hill (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity College London · GBGlasgow Caledonian University · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

Department of Health 06/36/04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegular physical activity reduces the risk of mortality from all causes, with a powerful beneficial effect on risk of falls and hip fractures. However, physical activity levels are low in the older population and previous studies have demonstrated only modest, short-term improvements in activity levels with intervention. DESIGN/

methodsPragmatic 3 arm parallel design cluster controlled trial of class-based exercise (FAME), home-based exercise (OEP) and usual care amongst older people (aged 65 years and over) in primary care. The primary outcome is the achievement of recommended physical activity targets 12 months after cessation of intervention. Secondary outcomes include functional assessments, predictors of exercise adherence, the incidence of falls, fear of falling, quality of life and continuation of physical activity after intervention, over a two-year follow up. An economic evaluation including participant and NHS costs will be embedded in the clinical trial. DISCUSSION: The ProAct65 trial will explore and evaluate the potential for increasing physical activity among older people recruited through general practice. The trial will be conducted in a relatively unselected population, and will address problems of selective recruitment, potentially low retention rates, variable quality of interventions and falls risk.

trial registrationTrial Registration: ISRCTN43453770.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesExercise TherapyHealth Services for the AgedHome Care ServicesPeer GroupPrimary Health CareAccidental FallsAgedCluster AnalysisCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandFearHealth Care CostsHumansPatient ComplianceQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID20082696
PMCPMC2821309
OpenAlexW2154860503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.