Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20082204›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2010

[Identification and grouping of pain patients according to claims data].

A Freytag, G Schiffhorst, R Thoma, K Strick, C Gries, A Becker, R-D Treede, G Müller-Schwefe, H-R Casser, C Luley and 6 more

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [The new code F45.41].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2010
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

A FreytagIGES Institut GmbH, FriedrichStr. 180, 10117, Berlin. kontakt@iges.de
G Schiffhorst
R Thoma
K Strick
C Gries
A Becker
R-D Treede
G Müller-Schwefe
H-R Casser
C Luley
A Höer
M Ujeyl
H Gothe
J Kugler
G Glaeske
B Häussler
IGES Institut · DEDeutsche Schmerzgesellschaft · DEGKV Spitzenverband · DETU Dresden · DEÄrztliche Gesellschaft zur Gesundheitsförderung e.V · DEGrünenthal Group (Germany) · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity of Bremen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ICD classification does not provide the opportunity to adequately identify pain patients. Therefore we developed an alternative method for the identification and classification of pain patients which is based on prescription and diagnoses data from the year 2006 of one nationwide sickness fund (DAK) and which is led by two main assumptions: 1. Beneficiaries without prescription of an analgetic drug but with a diagnosis pattern that is characteristic of patients who are treated with opioids are also likely to be pain patients. 2. Each combination of diagnosis groups can be traced back to one primary diagnosis out of a diagnosis group according to the patient classification system CCS (Clinical Classifications Software). The selection of this diagnosis group (CCS) allows for the allocation of the beneficiary to only one pain type. As a result we identified 65 combinations of CCS diagnosis groups--aggregated to nine "CCS pain types"--to which 77.1% of all patients with at least two opioid prescriptions can be allocated: 26.3% to pain due to arthrosis, 18.0% to pain due to intervertebral disc illnesses, 13.1% to other specific back pain, 6.7% to neuropathic pain, 4.5% to unspecific back pain, 4.2% to headache, 2.4% to pain after traumatic fractures, 1.3% to pain of multimorbid, high-maintenance patients, and 0.6% to cancer pain. Based on our method beneficiaries who have a high probability of suffering from moderate to strong pain can be identified and included in further claims data analyses of health care delivery and utilization pattern of pain-related disorders in Germany.

Indexed as

International Classification of DiseasesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, OpioidChronic DiseaseCost ControlDelivery of Health CareDiagnosis-Related GroupsGermanyHealth Care RationingHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID20082204
OpenAlexW1486021967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.