Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20082116›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2011

Phase I study of 17-allylamino-17 demethoxygeldanamycin, gemcitabine and/or cisplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors.

Joleen Hubbard, Charles Erlichman, David O Toft, Rui Qin, Bridget A Stensgard, Sara Felten, Cynthia Ten Eyck, Gretchen Batzel, S Percy Ivy, Paul Haluska

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Cytoplasmic HSP90α expression is associated with perineural invasion in pancreatic cancer.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joleen HubbardDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Charles Erlichman
David O Toft
Rui Qin
Bridget A Stensgard
Sara Felten
Cynthia Ten Eyck
Gretchen Batzel
S Percy Ivy
Paul Haluska
Mayo Clinic · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Use of microfluidic tumor cultures to enable clinical trials of therapies for ovarian cancerP50CA136393 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Zhenkun Lou · 2009 to 2026
$37.0M
Paul Calabresi Program in Clinical/Translational Research at Mayo ClinicK12CA090628 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WEROHA, SARAVUT · 2001 to 2025
$19.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA090628NCI NIH HHS CA66912NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090628NCI NIH HHS N01 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA136393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and characterize the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of 17-AAG, gemcitabine and/or cisplatin. Levels of the proteins Hsp90, Hsp70 and ILK were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PMBC) lysates to assess the effects of 17-AAG. EXPERIMENTAL

designPhase I dose-escalating trial using a "3 + 3" design performed in patients with advanced solid tumors. Once the MTD of gemcitabine + 17-AAG + cisplatin was determined, dose escalation of 17-AAG with constant doses of gemcitabine and cisplatin was attempted. After significant hematologic toxicity occurred, the protocol was amended to evaluate three cohorts: gemcitabine and 17-AAG; 17-AAG and cisplatin; and gemcitabine, 17-AAG and cisplatin with modified dosing.

resultsThe 39 patients enrolled were evaluable for toxicity and response. The MTD for cohort A was 154 mg/m(2) of 17-AAG, 750 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine, and 40 mg/m(2) of cisplatin. In cohort A, DLTs were observed at the higher dose level and included neutropenia, hyperbilirubinemia, dehydration, GGT elevation, hyponatremia, nausea, vomiting, and thrombocytopenia. The MTD for cohort C was 154 mg/m(2) of 17-AAG and 750 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine, with one DLT observed (alkaline phosphatase elevation) observed. In cohort C, DLTs of thrombocytopenia, fever and dyspnea were seen at the higher dose level. The remaining cohorts were closed to accrual due to toxicity. Six patients experienced partial responses. Mean Hsp90 levels were decreased and levels of Hsp70 were increased compared to baseline.

conclusions17-AAG in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin demonstrated antitumor activity, but significant hematologic toxicities were encountered. 17-AAG combined with gemcitabine is tolerable and has demonstrated evidence of activity at the MTD. The recommended phase II dose is defined as 154 mg/m(2) of 17-AAG and 750 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine, and is currently being investigated in phase II studies in ovarian and pancreatic cancers. There is no recommended phase II dose for the cisplatin-containing combinations.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzoquinonesBiomarkers, TumorCisplatinCohort StudiesDeoxycytidineDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGemcitabineHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansAntineoplastic AgentsBenzoquinonesBiomarkers, TumorCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabineHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsLactams, MacrocyclicProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesScaffold Protein ILKtanespimycin

Identifiers

PMID20082116
PMCPMC2908718
OpenAlexW2029761703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.