Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20082066›Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2010

Positive impact of compliance to strontium ranelate on the risk of nonvertebral osteoporotic fractures.

V Rabenda, J-Y Reginster

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Partial adherence: a new perspective on health economic assessment in osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2011
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V RabendaDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, CHU-Bât. B23, 4000, Liège, Belgium. veronique.rabenda@ulg.ac.be
J-Y Reginster
University of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryAdherence is now one of the major issues in the management of osteoporosis. This paper relates the relationship existing between adherence to strontium ranelate and the risk of subsequent nonvertebral fracture among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

introductionThe aim of this study is to investigate compliance to strontium ranelate (SR) therapy and the impact of compliance on the risk of nonvertebral fractures among women with osteoporosis.

methodsThis study was a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from two international, phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies (the Spinal Osteoporosis Therapeutic Intervention and Treatment Of Peripheral Osteoporosis). A nested case-control study was performed in the strontium ranelate-treated population. Compliance was quantified using the medication possession ratio (MPR).

resultsTwo hundred eighty-five nonvertebral fracture cases (hip fx n = 70; major nonvertebral fx n = 213) were identified and matched to 1,425 controls. The mean MPR was 86.8% for controls and 82.6% for cases (p < 0.001). Women who were compliant to SR had a 38% reduction in all nonvertebral fractures compared with those who were not (OR = 0.62; 95%CI[0.47-0.81; p < 0.001). Considering hip fractures only, the risk was reduced by 50% for compliant patients compared to noncompliant patients (OR = 0.50; 95%CI[0.28-0.88]; p < 0.05).

conclusionOur analyses emphasize the importance of good compliance to treatment in order to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. In particular, there was a greater reduction in the risk of nonvertebral and hip fractures with increase compliance.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOrganometallic CompoundsOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalOsteoporotic FracturesThiophenesTreatment OutcomeBone Density Conservation AgentsOrganometallic Compoundsstrontium ranelateThiophenes

Identifiers

PMID20082066
OpenAlexW2072378951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.