ArticleThe Plant cell2010
Bifurcation and enhancement of autonomous-nonautonomous retrotransposon partnership through LTR Swapping in soybean.
Article in The Plant cell, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- A near-complete genome assembly of onion resolves its genomic architecture, origin, and evolution.Plant communications · 2026Article
- Evolutionary Study of Transposable Elements: Structural Characterization and Phylogenomic Profiling in Plant Genomes.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Review
- LTR retrotransposons shape genome architecture, function, and evolution in diverse plant species.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Deciphering Complex Interactions Between LTR Retrotransposons and Three Papaver Species Using LTR_Stream.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Genome-wide characterization and evolution analysis of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements in Barley (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Transposable elements: multifunctional players in the plant genome.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- PlantLTRdb: An interactive database for 195 plant species LTR-retrotransposons.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- The final piece of the Triangle of U: Evolution of the tetraploid Brassica carinata genome.The Plant cell · 2022Article
- Distinct composition and amplification dynamics of transposable elements in sacred lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.).The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2022Article
- Analyzing lignin biosynthesis pathways in rattan using improved co-expression networks of NACs and MYBs.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Progress in soybean functional genomics over the past decade.Plant biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Improved Brassica oleracea JZS assembly reveals significant changing of LTR-RT dynamics in different morphotypes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020Article
- Becoming a Selfish Clan: Recombination Associated to Reverse-Transcription in LTR Retrotransposons.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Review
- Comparative analysis of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) and long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons in six Citrus species.BMC plant biology · 2019Article
- Genome-Wide Survey and Comparative Analysis of Long Terminal Repeat (LTR) Retrotransposon Families in Four Gossypium Species.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Proliferation of Regulatory DNA Elements Derived from Transposable Elements in the Maize Genome.Plant physiology · 2018Article
- LTR_retriever: A Highly Accurate and Sensitive Program for Identification of Long Terminal Repeat Retrotransposons.Plant physiology · 2018Article
- High-frequency recombination between members of an LTR retrotransposon family during transposition bursts.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Genomic fossils reveal adaptation of non-autonomous pararetroviruses driven by concerted evolution of noncoding regulatory sequences.PLoS pathogens · 2017Article
- GrTEdb: the first web-based database of transposable elements in cotton (Gossypium raimondii).Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons, the most abundant genomic components in flowering plants, are classifiable into autonomous and nonautonomous elements based on their structural completeness and transposition capacity. It has been proposed that selection is the major force for maintaining sequence (e.g., LTR) conservation between nonautonomous elements and their autonomous counterparts. Here, we report the structural, evolutionary, and expression characterization of a giant retrovirus-like soybean (Glycine max) LTR retrotransposon family, SNARE. This family contains two autonomous subfamilies, SARE(A) and SARE(B), that appear to have evolved independently since the soybean genome tetraploidization event approximately 13 million years ago, and a nonautonomous subfamily, SNRE, that originated from SARE(A). Unexpectedly, a subset of the SNRE elements, which amplified from a single founding SNRE element within the last approximately 3 million years, have been dramatically homogenized with either SARE(A) or SARE(B) primarily in the LTR regions and bifurcated into distinct subgroups corresponding to the two autonomous subfamilies. We uncovered evidence of region-specific swapping of nonautonomous elements with autonomous elements that primarily generated various nonautonomous recombinants with LTR sequences from autonomous elements of different evolutionary lineages, thus revealing a molecular mechanism for the enhancement of preexisting partnership and the establishment of new partnership between autonomous and nonautonomous elements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.