Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20080708›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

NeuroD1 induces terminal neuronal differentiation in olfactory neurogenesis.

Camille Boutin, Olaf Hardt, Antoine de Chevigny, Nathalie Coré, Sandra Goebbels, Ralph Seidenfaden, Andreas Bosio, Harold Cremer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nutrients · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Neuronal reprogramming in treating spinal cord injury.Neural regeneration research · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Camille BoutinInstitut de Biologie du Développement de Marseille-Luminy, Unité Mixte de Recherche 6216, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Université de la Méditerranée, Campus de Luminy, 13288 Marseille, France.
Olaf Hardt
Antoine de Chevigny
Nathalie Coré
Sandra Goebbels
Ralph Seidenfaden
Andreas Bosio
Harold Cremer
Institut de Biologie du Développement Marseille · FRMiltenyi Biotec (Germany) · DEMax Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After their generation and specification in periventricular regions, neuronal precursors maintain an immature and migratory state until their arrival in the respective target structures. Only here are terminal differentiation and synaptic integration induced. Although the molecular control of neuronal specification has started to be elucidated, little is known about the factors that control the latest maturation steps. We aimed at identifying factors that induce terminal differentiation during postnatal and adult neurogenesis, thereby focusing on the generation of periglomerular interneurons in the olfactory bulb. We isolated neuronal precursors and mature neurons from the periglomerular neuron lineage and analyzed their gene expression by microarray. We found that expression of the bHLH transcription factor NeuroD1 strikingly coincides with terminal differentiation. Using brain electroporation, we show that overexpression of NeuroD1 in the periventricular region in vivo leads to the rapid appearance of cells with morphological and molecular characteristics of mature neurons in the subventricular zone and rostral migratory stream. Conversely, shRNA-induced knockdown of NeuroD1 inhibits terminal neuronal differentiation. Thus, expression of a single transcription factor is sufficient to induce neuronal differentiation of neural progenitors in regions that normally do not show addition of new neurons. These results suggest a considerable potential of NeuroD1 for use in cell-therapeutic approaches in the nervous system.

Indexed as

AnimalsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCell DifferentiationElectroporationInterneuronsMiceOlfactory BulbBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsNeurod1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID20080708
PMCPMC2824315
OpenAlexW2165778325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.